User talk:BullyanDZ

August 2025

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, 1991 Tifariti offensive, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 14:10, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. MadelynnSienna (talk) 14:53, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies in advance, will make sure to not do it again Bulyan (talk) 15:03, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Hammadid dynasty. Skitash (talk) 15:57, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What did i remove? Bulyan (talk) 16:01, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You removed Nominal vassal of the Abbasid or Fatimid Caliphate. Please slow down and pay attention to what others are saying. I will also leave a list of links to articles that I suggest you read. M.Bitton (talk) 16:04, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Algeria. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. M.Bitton (talk) 16:01, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm new to wikipedia, but i just wanted to ask, what's wrong with my edit? Bulyan (talk) 16:04, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That's obvious. As to what you did wrong, it has already been explained. As stated above, I left a list of links to useful articles (see below) that I suggest you read. If you think that's too time consuming, you can always start by familiarising yourself with Wikipedia's principal core content policies. Once done, you can start editing with confidence, though I suggest you make small edits and see which ones stick. If reverted, don't be tempted to revert, instead, use the article's talk page to highlight any issue or improvement that you have in mind. M.Bitton (talk) 16:24, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Talking about the Algeria one Bulyan (talk) 17:09, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. M.Bitton (talk) 20:22, 15 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Bulyan, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! M.Bitton (talk) 16:05, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Abdelkader Alloula Theater moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Abdelkader Alloula Theater. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Tenshi! (Talk page) 14:37, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Abdelkader Alloula Theater (October 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Timtrent were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Abdelkader Alloula Theater and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 22:08, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, BullyanDZ! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 22:08, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

October 2025

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Algiers, you may be blocked from editing. Skitash (talk) 09:52, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Skitash (talk) 09:52, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@BullyanDZ: You've previously been warned about edit-warring and about making edits with no explanation. You've now repeated reverted edits without discussion again at Tlemcen, Biskra, and Batna. This is still edit-warring. When you are reverted, please use talk pages to request clarifications and to discuss solutions. Otherwise, you will run into trouble, as was warned above. R Prazeres (talk) 22:40, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Does it apply to the user reverting as well? BullyanDZ (talk) 09:54, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]