User talk:ChimaFan12

Friends, Lovers, and the Big Terrible Thing

Hello! Mind taking a look at what I did to Friends, Lovers, and the Big Terrible Thing? See if it helps the afd case. Have a great day! --Ouro (blah blah) 07:37, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That’s good! It addresses my concerns very well. I think it can be closed. Thank you. :) ChimaFan12 (talk) 02:58, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Happy to hear that, all right. I'll close the discussion in line with what You wrote. Have a great day! --Ouro (blah blah) 05:50, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged in, have 500 edits, and have an account age of 30 days, and you are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

This is just a procedural notice, prompted by the discussion at Talk:South Park season 27. Best, 45dogs (they/them) (talk page) 03:34, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

November 2025

Welcome to Wikipedia. Editors are expected to treat each other with respect and civility. On this encyclopedia project, editors assume good faith while interacting with other editors, which you did not appear to do at Talk:Center for Science and Culture. Here is Wikipedia's welcome page, and it is hoped that you will assume the good faith of other editors and continue to help us improve Wikipedia! Thank you very much! Doug Weller talk 18:53, 15 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, which interaction are you referring to? ChimaFan12 (talk) 19:26, 15 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your revert of Sangdeboeuf Doug Weller talk 20:18, 15 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your concern, however, I believe I am assuming good faith. I'm reviewing your edit comment there. You say that I should not revert an edit made by a "more expensive" user than myself? What does that mean? ChimaFan12 (talk) 20:20, 15 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Topic ban appeal successful

I am writing to inform you that as a result of this discussion, your topic ban from all pages and discussions related to the Marvel Cinematic Universe has been lifted. You are once again welcome to edit these topics, but note that a return to the behaviour which led to the ban being imposed in the first place may quickly lead to additional and more severe sanctions. Please ask if you need help, and be aware of our guide to dispute resolution. Thank you and happy editing. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 19:06, 8 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hello ChimaFan12! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Navigating topic activity following a topic unban, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:04, 16 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

In appreciation

		The Surreal Barnstar
		I don't quite know what went on in that thread, but thank you for standing up for yourself and Wikipedia policies. Please feel free to ask me if you need any input on anything in the future. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 11:26, 18 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]