DZ
DefZone.Net

Kien thuc cong nghe & giai tri

Wiki Article

User talk:CuratorArchive

Nguồn dữ liệu từ Wikipedia, hiển thị bởi DefZone.Net

Xem trên WikipediaBài ngẫu nhiên khác

Your submission at Articles for creation: Giorgos Pol. Ioannidis (November 23)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Please read the guide for citing WP:OFFLINESOURCES.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 20:10, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, CuratorArchive! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 20:10, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Giorgos Pol. Ioannidis (December 6)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Netherzone was:
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
The draft is written and structured like a promotional website for the artist. It contains unnecessary details and the sheer number of images used is excessive. Much of this content belongs on his personal website. See WP:NOTWEBHOST.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Netherzone (talk) 16:57, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

December 2025

[edit]
Information icon

Hello CuratorArchive. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Giorgos Pol. Ioannidis, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:CuratorArchive. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=CuratorArchive|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Netherzone (talk) 17:00, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your message, and my apologies for the delayed reply — I have only just seen it.
I confirm that I am not being paid, directly or indirectly, to write or edit this draft. I have no financial interest or any form of compensation related to Giorgos Pol. Ioannidis or this article.
My edits come from my personal interest in art and in documenting Greek artists whose work I believe merits inclusion based on published sources. I fully respect Wikipedia’s policies on neutrality and conflict of interest, and I am editing solely as a volunteer, relying only on verifiable references.
If you believe that any part of the draft — including the number of images or specific sections — should be reduced or adjusted to better comply with Wikipedia standards, I would appreciate your guidance and I will make the necessary changes immediately.
Please let me know if you need any further clarification. CuratorArchive (talk) 21:59, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Please explain how it is that you apparently have the copyrights to photographs of his works if there is no connection. How did you acquire these rights? Thank you, I await your response. Netherzone (talk) 23:59, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your question. I am happy to clarify.
The photographs of the artworks were not uploaded by me in the beginning.
They were uploaded to Wikimedia Commons directly by the artist, who also contacted the Commons permissions team and provided his authorization for their use under the appropriate license.
The images were already properly licensed and publicly available on Commons, so I simply used them in the draft to illustrate works that are discussed in published sources.
This process did not involve any compensation, editorial direction, or request from the artist. I am not acting on his behalf. I am only using media that has already been approved and released through the standard Commons procedure.
If you need something more, about this situation, please let me know.
— CuratorArchive CuratorArchive (talk) 10:22, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, I think I understand now. The image licenses says CuratorArchive uploaded these to Commons, so you are Giorgos Pol. Ionannidis himself, and the article Draft:Giorgos Pol. Ioannidis is an autobiography. Netherzone (talk) 13:23, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I am unable to verify the citations because there are no associated URL links. Are the original titles of the publications in Greek or another language? When I search for them online or in various library repositories, including the Internet Archive and the Wikipedia Library, and JSTOR, I do not get any results. If the publications are written in other language, please add that title - in the original language - and place the English translation title in parentheses. Add a URL to the original Greek (or other) version. That way the reviewers can search using the Greek (or other language) title to insure that the content of the article is actually what the source says. - Netherzone (talk) 14:43, 15 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Giorgos Pol. Ioannidis (December 9)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LuniZunie was:
Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Wikipedia guidelines prohibit the use of LLMs to write articles from scratch. In addition, LLM-generated articles usually have multiple quality issues, to include:
Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
– LuniZunie(talk) 21:33, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your review and for pointing out these concerns.
I fully understand Wikipedia’s guidelines regarding the use of large language models and I will not use AI-generated text for this draft.
My intention is to rewrite all sections manually, using only published, verifiable sources and ensuring a strictly neutral, encyclopedic tone.
I will also revise the structure to avoid essay-like writing, remove any speculative or vague statements, and ensure that all references correspond directly to reliable published material.
If you have any specific areas you believe should be prioritised or significantly adjusted first, I would greatly appreciate your guidance before I proceed with the revisions.
Thank you again for your time and assistance.
— CuratorArchive CuratorArchive (talk) 22:04, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@CuratorArchive Please do not use AI to respond on talk pages. – LuniZunie(talk) 22:09, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Of course — thank you for letting me know.
I will write my comments myself and avoid AI-generated responding. CuratorArchive (talk) 10:32, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Giorgos Pol. Ioannidis (December 13)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Netherzone was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Not ready for article space. Some claims are unsourced and seem that they might be synthesis or WP:OR. The references are formatted incorrectly with a list of numbers followed by a list of the citations. The photographs are formatted in an odd way, that does not follow MOS; they are centered and should be either on the left or right side (but avoiding "sandwiching") or placed in a formatted gallery near the lower part of the article. Many of the the references do not contain URLs, so the content is currently unverifiable. Please add links to the citations if possible so they can be read by reviewers
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Netherzone (talk) 19:25, 13 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I am unable to verify the citations because there are no associated URL links and a search does not find these publications. Are the original titles of the publications in Greek or another language? When I search for them online or in various library repositories, including the Internet Archive and the Wikipedia Library, and JSTOR, I do not get any results. If the publications are written in other language, please add that title - in the original language - and place the English translation title in parentheses. Add a URL to the original Greek (or other) version. That way the reviewers can search using the Greek (or other language) title to insure that the content of the article is actually what the source says. -Netherzone (talk) 14:48, 15 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your detailed comment.
Most of the publications cited for the critical discussion (e.g. Christou, Kilessopoulou, Tziolas) are published exhibition catalogues and art-historical texts written in Greek and issued by public galleries, museums, and cultural institutions, primarily before the widespread digitisation of such material. These are standard secondary sources in art history and are commonly not available online or indexed in digital repositories.
To address your concern, I have:
• added multiple independent online sources (national media, institutional cultural platforms, and television coverage) to document exhibitions and public presentations where online verification exists;
• supplemented the critical discussion with online-verifiable coverage for recent exhibitions;
• limited the use of non-digitised exhibition catalogues strictly to historical and analytical commentary, in line with common art-historical practice.
I hope this clarification addresses the verification concerns raised. CuratorArchive (talk) 20:08, 15 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Giorgos Pol. Ioannidis (December 23)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hoary was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
What the draft says: Works by Ioannidis are held in public collections in Greece and abroad, including the Macedonian Studies Society Gallery, MOMus – Museum of Contemporary Art Thessaloniki, the Municipal Gallery of Thessaloniki, the Municipal Gallery of Corfu, the Vorres Museum, the Pieridis Gallery and the Galleria di Belle Arti in Florence, as documented in exhibition catalogues and official museum collection records.

Surprisingly, this is all attributed to a single source. (And alarmingly, this is an interview.)

What does this source actually say? This: his works can be found in big and important collections, like Isaac’s Sacrifice (1992) that is in the collection of the State Museum of Contemporary Art in Thessaloniki, Greece

What about the other six collections?

On 13 December Netherzone wrote: The references are formatted incorrectly with a list of numbers followed by a list of the citations. Now, after almost two weeks, they still are.

For "Solo exhibitions (selection)", five exhibitions are presented. And five sources are provided for them. Which source(s) will confirm which exhibition(s)?

For "Group exhibitions (selection)", four exhibitions are presented. And four sources are provided for them. Which source(s) will confirm which exhibition(s)?

English translations of the Greek titles of sources are helpful, but only as a supplement: the actual (Greek) titles should be presented. (This makes it much easier to find the page if the directory tree of the website is ever rearranged, as does happen.) --
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Hoary (talk) 08:05, 23 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the review and the detailed feedback.
I am currently working on improving the draft in line with your comments and will resubmit once the issues have been addressed. CuratorArchive (talk) 08:57, 23 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]