DZ
DefZone.Net

Kien thuc cong nghe & giai tri

Wiki Article

User talk:Medievalfran

Nguồn dữ liệu từ Wikipedia, hiển thị bởi DefZone.Net

Xem trên WikipediaBài ngẫu nhiên khác

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, Medievalfran, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!  I dream of horses  If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message  (talk to me) (My edits) @ 23:52, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I dream of horses Many thanks for the welcome - - I am sure that the 'call for help' function will be very useful indeed when it comes to setting up a new project page (hoping to turn our one off meetup into a more systematic and regular thing!). Thank you. --Medievalfran (talk) 15:07, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Medievalfran I am looking for editors who might be able to help out at an Art+Feminism wikipedia edit a thon that I'm organising with the live art development agency in London on the 5th March. Please let me know if you might be interested! More details here https://www.facebook.com/events/492922121640318/ many thanks CQualmann (talk) 11:58, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red

[edit]

Hi there, Medievalfran, and welcome to Women in Red. I see you have already created three biographies. As a relatively recent editor, you might be interested in our Ten Simple Rules. If ever you run into any difficulties or need assistance, please let me know. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 16:31, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

→ Ipigott Thank you very much for the link to the rules and info about the Women in Red initiatives! Looking forward to working on more bios soon.Medievalfran (talk) 13:08, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Suggest bot

[edit]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

[edit]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
125 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C African immigrants to Sweden (talk) Add sources
1,465 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Radio Free Asia (talk) Add sources
11 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Nora K. Chadwick (talk) Add sources
394 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: FA Old English literature (talk) Add sources
30 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: C Susanna Centlivre (talk) Add sources
801 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Grendel (talk) Add sources
6 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Pusilha (talk) Cleanup
10 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C La Milpa (talk) Cleanup
44 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Joe Mercer (jockey) (talk) Cleanup
4 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Start Sybren Polet (talk) Expand
149 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Grendel (novel) (talk) Expand
43 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Balankanche (talk) Expand
840 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Córdoba, Spain (talk) Unencyclopaedic
273 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Beowulf & Grendel (talk) Unencyclopaedic
70 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: B Performance poetry (talk) Unencyclopaedic
87 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: GA Christianity in Anglo-Saxon England (talk) Merge
65 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: B Black Caribs (talk) Merge
1,331 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B Grenfell Tower fire (talk) Merge
18 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: GA LGBT writers in the Dutch-language area (talk) Wikify
43 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Jane Drew (talk) Wikify
38 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Liz Lochhead (talk) Wikify
3 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Start Dorothy De Navarro (talk) Orphan
2 Quality: Low, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: Start Margaret (the Lame) of Magdeburg (ca. 1210-1250) (talk) Orphan
33 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: C Chac Chel (talk) Orphan
10 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Hector Munro Chadwick (talk) Stub
10 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start De Bezige Bij (talk) Stub
6 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Eric Stanley (talk) Stub
38 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Black Welsh people (talk) Stub
66 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Marabou (ethnicity) (talk) Stub
5 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Yaxuná (talk) Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 17:33, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lola Olufemi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Internationalist. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Carol Braun Pasternack for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Carol Braun Pasternack is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carol Braun Pasternack until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Esprit15d • talk • contribs 14:06, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Your submission at Articles for creation: Walter C. Leedy has been accepted

[edit]
Walter C. Leedy, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hoary (talk) 05:08, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: David Hemsoll (October 23)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hoary was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for academics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
He sounds like a worthy academic, but this doesn't make him notable in Wikipedia terms. An article about Hemsoll will need to summarize other scholars' descriptions of and comments on Hemsoll's work. I note from this draft that just last year Yale UP published his book Emulating antiquity: Renaissance buildings from Brunelleschi to Michelangelo. Its scope is ambitious and in my experience Yale UP is a first-rate publisher (something I can't say about all well known university presses). So I imagine that reviews are coming out. What do these reviews say?
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Hoary (talk) 13:21, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Medievalfran! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Hoary (talk) 13:21, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited International Society for the Study of Medievalism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Antiquity.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for your efforts

[edit]
The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
Thank you for your continued service adding to Wikipedia throughout 2020. - Cdjp1 (talk) 17:35, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Original Barnstar
Thank you for your support with publishing my first article SavvyOne1988 (talk) 18:22, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

[edit]
Hi Medievalfran! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 10:38, Friday, December 31, 2021 (UTC)

Mission 1 Mission 2 Mission 3 Mission 4 Mission 5 Mission 6 Mission 7
Say Hello to the World An Invitation to Earth Small Changes, Big Impact The Neutral Point of View The Veil of Verifiability The Civility Code Looking Good Together

Your GA nomination of Avril Coleridge-Taylor

[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Avril Coleridge-Taylor you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tim riley -- Tim riley (talk) 13:01, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Avril Coleridge-Taylor

[edit]

The article Avril Coleridge-Taylor you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Avril Coleridge-Taylor for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tim riley -- Tim riley (talk) 17:40, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Avril Coleridge-Taylor

[edit]

The article Avril Coleridge-Taylor you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Avril Coleridge-Taylor for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tim riley -- Tim riley (talk) 15:01, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]
An Orosius-themed cookie for you! Lajmmoore (talk) 13:34, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red October 2023

[edit]
Women in Red October 2023, Vol 9, Iss 10, Nos 251, 252, 284, 285, 286


Online events:

See also

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:53, 29 September 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 1 § Category:WikiProject X members

[edit]

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 1 § Category:WikiProject X members on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Qwerfjkltalk 09:34, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red December 2023

[edit]
Women in Red December 2023, Vol 9, Iss 12, Nos 251, 252, 290, 291, 292


Online events:

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:24, 27 November 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red February 2024

[edit]
Women in Red | February 2024, Volume 10, Issue 2, Numbers 293, 294, 297, 298


Online events:

Announcement

  • Please let other wikiprojects know about our February Black women event.

Tip of the month:

  • AllAfrica can now be searched on the ProQuest tab at the WP Library.

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk 20:09, 28 January 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red March 2024

[edit]
Women in Red | March 2024, Volume 10, Issue 3, Numbers 293, 294, 299, 300, 301


Online events:

Announcements

Tip of the month:

  • When creating a new article, check various spellings, including birth name, married names
    and pseudonyms, to be sure an article doesn't already exist.

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk 20:23, 25 February 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Marjorie James

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Medievalfran. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Marjorie James, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:05, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Rolfe Kentish

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Medievalfran. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rolfe Kentish, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:11, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Draft:Marjorie James

[edit]

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:Marjorie James, was deleted as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Liz Read! Talk! 03:07, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red May 2024

[edit]
Women in Red | May 2024, Volume 10, Issue 5, Numbers 293, 294, 305, 306, 307


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Tip of the month:

  • Use open-access references wherever possible, but a paywalled reliable source
    is better than none, particularly for biographies of living people.

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 06:17, 28 April 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]


Wikiproject

[edit]

Hi, I see you've contributed a lot to Old English literature, would you be interested in a taskforce on oral tradition? Kowal2701 (talk) 09:20, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Kowal2701: thanks so much for flagging this Taskforce! I'll take a look at the project page. I don't have loads of time for editing at the moment, but this project sounds excellent, thank you! Medievalfran (talk) 12:27, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No worries, only contribute as much as you want to Kowal2701 (talk) 14:42, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mukti (magazine) has been accepted

[edit]
Mukti (magazine), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Lajmmoore (talk) 17:19, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Victoria Siddall

[edit]

On 11 October 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Victoria Siddall, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Victoria Siddall is the first woman to be appointed the director of the 168-year-old National Portrait Gallery in London? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Victoria Siddall. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Victoria Siddall), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:04, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red November 2024

[edit]
Women in Red | November 2024, Vol 10, Issue 11, Nos 293, 294, 321, 322, 323


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 20:45, 29 October 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

DYK for Black Lesbian and Gay Centre

[edit]

On 6 November 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Black Lesbian and Gay Centre, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a rainbow plaque marks the site of Peckham's Black Lesbian and Gay Centre? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Black Lesbian and Gay Centre. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Black Lesbian and Gay Centre), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:03, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Organisation of Women of African and Asian Descent

[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Organisation of Women of African and Asian Descent you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of FuzzyMagma -- FuzzyMagma (talk) 10:05, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Organisation of Women of African and Asian Descent

[edit]

The article Organisation of Women of African and Asian Descent you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Organisation of Women of African and Asian Descent for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of FuzzyMagma -- FuzzyMagma (talk) 10:21, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, FuzzyMagma, for taking the time to review the article! Nice to see only a couple things to do, hopefully someone can pick that up. With appreciation Medievalfran (talk) 13:50, 29 November 2024 (UTC).[reply]
No, I think you need to do alot of things. Start with MOS:LEAD. The article has a long way to go and I haven’t reviewed the other criterion because it’s a quick fail, see WP:GAQF, item 1 and 3 FuzzyMagma (talk) 13:53, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red December 2024

[edit]
Women in Red | December 2024, Vol 10, Issue 12, Nos 293, 294, 324, 325


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Tip of the month:

  • Think of rewarding contributors, especially newcomers, with a barnstar.

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 18:46, 29 November 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Paule Vézelay, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Constructivism.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:57, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (May 18)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 15:07, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the speedy review, @KylieTastic:, that was an accidental submission. I was attempting to add the template which includes the 'submit for review' button to a new user's sandbox, and managed to submit the sandbox instead! Hopefully when the user tries again (when they've got a more finished draft), they get the credit for page creation etc. Thanks again! Medievalfran (talk) 21:53, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, sorry I missed the wrong target. It's {{subst:AfC draft|username}} or {{draft}} to add a template for someone to submit. Cheers KylieTastic (talk) 22:50, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Aha - now THAT'S the template reminder I need, and now it's handy! Very many thanks :) Medievalfran (talk) 22:52, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Session 3rd Aug

[edit]

Hi Medievalfran, this is FasterPussycat1966. Sorry for my delay in contacting you but time has flown by this last month. Just to say that I'm going to the HA Wikipedia session this Sunday to learn and add details which could include Hackney Women's History etc. Will you be there? Regards FasterPussycat1966 FasterPussycat1966 (talk) 18:55, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo @FasterPussycat1966! I'll be there! Looking forward to it :) Medievalfran (talk) 10:46, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red September 2025

[edit]
Women in Red | September 2025, Vol 11, Issue 9, Nos. 326, 327, 347, 348, 349
Recognized as the most active, topic-based WikiProject by human changes.


Online events:

Announcements:

Tip of the Month:

  • Researching historical women writers who used pseudonyms requires careful investigation across multiple sources, as many women adopted pen names to avoid gender bias and judgment (e.g., being labeled a bluestocking) and, ultimately, to get published.

Progress ("moving the needle"):

Other ways to participate:

--Rosiestep (talk) 23:54, 31 August 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

DYK for Andrea Enisuoh

[edit]

On 2 September 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Andrea Enisuoh, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that Andrea Enisuoh campaigned to retain the name of her local library, honouring Trinidadian writer C. L. R. James? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Andrea Enisuoh. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Andrea Enisuoh), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 2 September 2025 (UTC) [reply]

story · music · places

Thank you for the nomination, and for your patience with the DYK process! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:38, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your support with it! It's been a good learning curve! Medievalfran (talk) 20:12, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for seeing it like that! - I enjoy a DYK that pictures a person together with achievements in art. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:45, 7 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Today is the birthday of the 16th Thomaskantor after Bach, remembered. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:04, 20 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
My 100th biography to the Main page in 2025 is Siegmund Nimsgern. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:17, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Green's 9th Edit-a-thon

[edit]

Hello Medievalfran:

WikiProject Women in Green is holding a month-long Good Article Editathon event in October 2025!

Running from October 1 to 31, 2025, WikiProject Women in Green (WiG) is hosting a Good Article (GA) editathon event with the theme What Women Do! All experience levels welcome. Never worked on a GA project before? We'll teach you how to get started. Or maybe you're an old hand at GAs – we'd love to have you involved! Participants are invited to work on nominating and/or reviewing GA submissions related to women and women's works (e.g., books, films) during the event period. We hope to collectively cover article subjects from at least 31 different occupations or professions (or broader roles in society) by month's end. GA resources and one-on-one support will be provided by experienced GA editors, and participants will have the opportunity to earn a special WiG barnstar for their efforts.

We hope to see you there!

Grnrchst (talk), Spookyaki (talk) & Alanna the Brave (talk)

You are receiving this message as a member of the WikiProject Women in Green. You can remove yourself from receiving notifications here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:38, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red | October 2025, Vol 11, Issue 10

[edit]
Women in Red | October 2025, Vol 11, Issue 10, Nos. 326, 327, 350, 351, 352
Recognized as the most active topic-based WikiProject by human changes.


Online events:

Announcements:

Tip of the Month:

  • Notable does not always mean admirable; you don't have to like an article's subject to make the article a useful contribution to Wikipedia.

Progress ("moving the needle"): Statistics available via various tools: previously, Humaniki tool; currently, QLever.
Thank you if you contributed one or more of the 6,283 articles during this period:

  • 19 May 2025: 20.114% of EN-WP biographies are about women (2,066,280; 415,618 women)
  • 24 September 2025: 20.20% of EN-WP biographies are about women (2,088,533 biographies; 421,901 women)

Other ways to participate:

--Rosiestep (talk) 18:31, 29 September 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

#MedievalWiki Editing Drive: 25th October 2025

[edit]

Hello Medievalfran.

We are reaching out as you have been highlighted by the Invitation List tool as someone who may be potentially interested in our upcoming #MedievalWiki event on Friday 25th October.

You can find out more about the event on the registration page. We hope to see you there!

With best wishes, EriedgenArc (talk) 17:18, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red - November 2025

[edit]
Women in Red | November 2025, Vol 11, Issue 11, Nos. 326, 327, 353, 354

Recognized as the most active topic-based WikiProject by human changes.

Online events:

Announcements:

Tip of the Month:

  • Verifiability is increasingly important as AI evolves. You should ensure that every statement made
    is adequately sourced. There should be no less than three independent reliable sources for each
    biography, including at least one source for each paragraph.

Progress ("moving the needle"):

  • Statistics available via various tools: previously, Humaniki tool; currently, QLever. Thank you if
    you contributed one or more of the 20,473 articles created in the past year.
  • 21 Oct 2024, 19.963% of biographies on EN-WP were about women (2,030,245 biographies; 405,305 women)
  • 28 Oct 2025: 20.23% of biographies on EN-WP were about women (2,094,677 biographies; 423,778 women)

Other ways to participate:

--Rosiestep (talk) 17:06, 30 October 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red - December 2025

[edit]
Women in Red | November 2025, Vol 11, Issue 12, Nos. 326, 327, 355, 356, 357

Recognized as the most active topic-based WikiProject by human changes.

Online events:

Announcements:

Tip of the Month:

Other ways to participate:

--Rosiestep (talk) 22:18, 28 November 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red - January 2026

[edit]
Women in Red | January 2026, Vol 12, Issue 1, Nos 357, 358, 359, 360


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest

--Rosiestep (talk) 23:32, 26 December 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]