User talk:PieWriter

Hello, PieWriter, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay.

Please sign your name on talk pages, by using four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically produce your username and the date, and helps to identify who said what and when. Please do not sign any edit that is not on a talk page.
Check out some of these pages:
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- Introduction to Wikipedia
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- The five pillars of Wikipedia | Cheatsheet of WikiCode

If you have a question that is not one of the frequently asked questions below, check out the Teahouse, ask me on my talk page, or click the button below. Happy editing and again, welcome! Rasnaboy (talk) 15:22, 7 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Rasnaboy What are some things I can start to help out in. I currently use Rater to rate new pages. PieWriter (talk) 11:04, 20 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Why can't I edit some particular pages?

Some pages that have been vandalized repeatedly are semi-protected, meaning that editing by new or unregistered users is prohibited through technical measures. If you have an account that is four days old and has made at least 10 edits, then you can bypass semi-protection and edit any semi-protected page. Some pages, such as highly visible templates, are fully-protected, meaning that only administrators can edit them. If this is not the case, you may have been blocked or your IP address caught up in a range block.

Where can I experiment with editing Wikipedia?

Use the main sandbox or create your own personal sandbox to experiment.

How do I create an article?

See how to create your first article, then use the Article Wizard to create one, and add references to the article as explained below.

How do I create citations?

Do a search on Google or your preferred search engine for the subject of the Wikipedia article that you want to create a citation for.
Find a website that supports the claim you are trying to find a citation for.
In a new tab/window, go to the citation generator, click on the 'An arbitrary website' bubble, and fill out as many fields as you can about the website you just found.
Click the 'Get reference wiki text' button.
Highlight, and then copy (Ctrl+C or Apple+C), the resulting text (it will be something like <ref> {{cite web | .... }}</ref>, copy the whole thing).
In the Wikipedia article, after the claim you found a citation for, paste (Ctrl+V or Apple+V) the text you copied.
If the article does not have a References or Notes section (or the like), add this to the bottom of the page, but above the External Links section and the categories:

==References==
{{Reflist}}

What is a WikiProject, and how do I join one?

A WikiProject is a group of editors that are interested in improving the coverage of certain topics on Wikipedia. (See this page for a complete list of WikiProjects.) If you would like to help, add your username to the list that is on the bottom of the WikiProject page.

Thank you! PieWriter (talk) 05:22, 8 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Pie writer removes information for outdated information

Why did you remove information on the current FK brskovo Squad as it is sourced from Transfermarkt and the squad was outdated so I updated the page Miodrag Božović hasn't played for FK brskovo — Preceding unsigned comment added by IKfootball (talk • contribs) 11:54, 18 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@IKfootball Sorry for that, but next time remember to convert external links, like google.com, to references (<ref>) or place them in the External Links section. PieWriter (talk) 12:00, 18 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks. IKfootball (talk) 12:27, 18 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback granted

Hi PieWriter. After reviewing your request, I have temporarily enabled rollback on your account until 2026-02-28. Please keep the following things in mind while using rollback:

Being granted rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle or Ultraviolet. It just adds a [rollback] button next to a page's latest live revision. It does not grant you any additional "status" on Wikipedia, nor does it change how Wikipedia policies apply to you.
Rollback should be used to revert clear and unambiguous cases of vandalism only. Never use rollback to revert good faith edits. For more information about when rollback is appropriate, see Wikipedia:Rollback § When to use rollback.
Rollback should never be used to edit war, and it should never be used in a content-related dispute to restore the page to your preferred revision. If rollback is abused or used for this purpose or any other inappropriate purpose, the permission will be revoked.
Use common sense. If you're not sure about something, ask!

I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, and feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate use of rollback. If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin) and Wikipedia:Rollback. Good luck and thanks! HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:02, 20 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@HJ Mitchell Okay, Thanks! PieWriter (talk) 00:18, 21 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@HJ Mitchell Is it possible to extend it? PieWriter (talk) 09:40, 17 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry

I reverted the wrong revision. I thought Huggle was supposed to lock me out when the vandalism gets reverted before I get a click on it. I guess it failed me this time. And then, I rollback both my previous edits on your talk page, thereby restoring the vandals message from earlier today... right after you had just thanked me for removing it! Before I get anything else screwed up, I'm gonna go have dinner now instead. Cheers! --DB1729^talk 00:00, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I noticed. Its all good PieWriter (talk) 00:23, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Marko Kovač (bishop)

"This biography of a living person needs additional citations for verification". Please, not add this banner for standard articles Noel baran (talk) 08:41, 30 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Noel baran May I clarify why I can't add it? PieWriter (talk) 08:42, 30 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

please Noel baran (talk) 08:48, 30 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Noel baran I don't understand why I shouldn't add it. PieWriter (talk) 08:52, 30 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please, indicate to me, where this article with WP:CS not pass for WP:V? It's supported by inline citations and all facts or claims correspond to reliable sources. Why you should add it? Noel baran (talk) 08:59, 30 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Out of the three sources cited, Catholic-Hierarchy is not reliable. I would like to put the notice there to encourage more users to add more reliable sources to the article to increase it verifiability. PieWriter (talk) 09:17, 30 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

But sources are reliable enough (save you note), and this banner exist to indicate problems, and what more reliable sources can be found in this case, as the vaticannews and Croatian Catholic news agency. Catholic hierarchy is a supportive source for it. Why this article needs this banner? Noel baran (talk) 09:26, 30 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

There are only 3 primary sources currently n the article, Per WP:BLP, the article need more sources for verifibility. PieWriter (talk) 10:28, 30 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Where here is indicated, that are needing more sources? Maybe I missed it Noel baran (talk) 10:48, 30 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean? PieWriter (talk) 13:16, 30 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

You wrote, that per WP:BLP the article need more sources for verifibility, I didn't find it Noel baran (talk) 03:24, 31 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

You removed it PieWriter (talk) 04:15, 31 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I am not talking about banner, but about a very WP:BLP Noel baran (talk) 07:41, 31 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

What is a very WP:BLP? PieWriter (talk) 00:37, 1 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Revert Back Edits

Hi PieWriter, I noticed you are continuoysly reverting my edits back, Let me complete my edits first. Your reason is not justified of moving an raticle into draft space. Anny3245 (talk) 06:45, 18 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Anny3245 Please make you edits at Draft:Moneypenny Group instead. PieWriter (talk) 06:46, 18 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

And why am i not publish it in main space, if the subject is notable? Am i not eligible to publish it in main space? Please explain.Anny3245 (talk) 07:13, 18 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

It’s is not a notable company, unfortunately. PieWriter (talk) 07:16, 18 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think you just do a WP:BEFORE, before adding a deletion tag. Let the other administrators to review the article and decide whether the topic meets notability requirements or not. Anny3245 (talk) 07:40, 18 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, but don’t remove the deletion tag. PieWriter (talk) 07:42, 18 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Did I? I know and understand Wikipedia's Guidelines. Anny3245 (talk) 08:13, 18 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Upcoming expiry of your rollbacker right

Hi, this is an automated reminder as part of Global reminder bot to let you know that your permission "rollbacker" (Rollbackers) will expire on 00:00, 28 February 2026 (UTC). For most rights, you will need to renew at WP:PERM, unless you have been told otherwise when your right was approved. To opt out of user right expiry notifications, add yourself to m:Global reminder bot/Exclusion. Leaderbot (talk) 19:41, 21 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Illegal drug trade in Jordan (March 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nighfidelity was:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Illegal drug trade in Jordan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Nighfidelity (talk) 15:35, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, PieWriter! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Nighfidelity (talk) 15:35, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes#Requirements to accept an edit, when to accept an edit

* Pppery * _{it has begun...} 21:35, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! PieWriter (talk) 02:12, 2 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Illegal drug trade in Jordan has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Illegal drug trade in Jordan. Thanks! SocDoneLeft (talk) 17:15, 8 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Illegal drug trade in Jordan (March 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SocDoneLeft was:

Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Wikipedia guidelines prohibit the use of LLMs to write articles from scratch. In addition, LLM-generated articles usually have multiple quality issues, to include:

Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch
Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
Essay-like writing
Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references
Close paraphrasing

Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This is a good draft. Several sections have severe WP:OVERATTRIBUTION. Please: 1. Rewrite to describe what the sources are talking about, not just that the sources exist. 2. Add additional page categories. 3. I suggest merging the "overview", "international cooperation", "history", and "major seizures" sections into one "history" section. The other sections should go into an "impact" section.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Illegal drug trade in Jordan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SocDoneLeft (talk) 17:58, 8 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@SocDoneLeft I made some changes to the draft to fix the issues you stated, can you take a look? PieWriter (talk) 23:52, 9 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]