Archives: User_talk:PokemonPerson/archive

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by PARAKANYAA was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of events). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

WP:LASTING and WP:NEVENT. All coverage in article is from a 5 day period.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Wrongful convictions of Charles Collins and Brian Boles and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

PARAKANYAA (talk) 09:29, 24 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, PokemonPerson! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! PARAKANYAA (talk) 09:29, 24 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to As You Wish (book). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it has no sources and it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. AlphaCore talk 21:37, 16 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, PokemonPerson. I've removed the 'Criticism' section you added to OpenStreetMap. I think Gjb0zWxOb's rationale of WP:CRITS is poor because WP:CRITS is just an essay; nevertheless, the section (in the state you added it) is clearly WP:UNDUE. A Wikipedia article is meant to cover notable aspects of a subject, and a blog post written by one person (regardless of their former relationship to the subject) is not that. Wikipedia has sections about controversies when they've received substantial coverage in reliable, independent sources. TheTechnician27 (Talk page) 00:37, 17 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That is ok. I'd like to continue the discussion at the talk page, but it's ok to have the section removed while it is under discussion.PokémonPerson 16:47, 17 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Killing of Rob Reiner and Michele Singer Reiner. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 22:13, 17 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]