User talk:Ragnarvrollo

Welcome!

Hi Ragnarvrollo! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! JarrahTree 00:06, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation

I noticed you have been editing some health-related articles, and I wanted to say that a bunch of us hang out at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine. You're welcome to join us if that's an area of editing that interests you. It's a good place to ask questions about finding good sources for medical content or writing style. Feel free to put the group's page on your watchlist, or stop by to say hello some time. There are also other groups like Wikipedia:WikiProject India and Wikipedia:WikiProject Bangladesh, if those sound more interesting. WhatamIdoing (talk) 02:04, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2025

Hello, I'm ~2025-31245-28. I noticed that you recently removed all content from a page. Please do not do this. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. As a rule, if you discover a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If a page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you wish to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~2025-31245-28 (talk) 20:10, 1 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I blanked it mistakenly to recreate and reform the page. Thank you. Ragnarvrollo (talk) 20:13, 1 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

All good. Most page blanking is done by mistake hence why the canned message has "If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored." You could try adjusting your settings to display a warning if no edit summary is typed and then wait until your edit is finished before putting anything in the edit summary box.

It would be better to include sources before making the page live next time. I will tag it for now and maybe someone who checks in on the maintenance category will get to it, but if no sources are added eventually the redirect will just be restored. Another option is to create a draft through WP:AFC at which point you can work on the page at your own pace, submitting only once it is ready. ~2025-31245-28 (talk) 20:23, 1 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

École de guerre moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to École de guerre. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. aesurias (talk) 07:26, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I've added multiple sources and submitted the draft for review. I hope now the article is good enough for being published. Thank you. Ragnarvrollo (talk) 10:56, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: École de guerre (December 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rambley was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:École de guerre and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Rambley ^{(talk / contribs)} 11:22, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ragnarvrollo! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Rambley ^{(talk / contribs)} 11:22, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]