Wiki Article
User talk:Robbydillallo
Nguồn dữ liệu từ Wikipedia, hiển thị bởi DefZone.Net
Welcome!
[edit]Hi Robbydillallo! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! Schazjmd (talk) 13:46, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
April 2025
[edit]
Hello Robbydillallo. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Sandbox, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.
Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.
Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Robbydillallo. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Robbydillallo|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Qrstw talk contribs 14:00, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
- I am not being directly or indirectly compensated for these edits. This is my first try to write about EdTech tools as I aspire to learn how cover the tools that help within academia. I see this as a quite challenging task as I understand that this will be perceived as promo. For me it's a target to reach that non-promotional tone. I hope this works and I am allowed to edit. Robbydillallo (talk) 11:30, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Plagiarismcheck.org (April 9)
[edit]
- in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
- reliable
- secondary
- strictly independent of the subject
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Plagiarismcheck.org and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
|
Hello, Robbydillallo!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Ca talk to me! 14:12, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
|
Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Plagiarismcheck.org
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Draft:Plagiarismcheck.org, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. GPL93 (talk) 15:14, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Nomination of Plagiarismcheck.org for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Plagiarismcheck.org, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Plagiarismcheck.org until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Plagiarismcheck.org moved to draftspace
[edit]Thanks for your contributions to Plagiarismcheck.org. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because of the discussion result at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Plagiarismcheck.org. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dclemens1971 (talk) 15:53, 30 April 2025 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Plagiarismcheck.org (May 5)
[edit]- in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
- reliable
- secondary
- strictly independent of the subject
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Plagiarismcheck.org and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
May 2025
[edit]
You still have not adequately responded or taken action to the inquiry regarding your appearance as an undisclosed paid editor. If you make any additional edits without complying, you may be blocked from editing. S0091 (talk) 16:15, 5 May 2025 (UTC)
- sorry, where do I comply with this? I think I missed this part Robbydillallo (talk) 11:06, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
- You may make the disclosure on your user page. (User:Robbydillallo) 331dot (talk) 11:07, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
- I replied to a message in this sequence for April 25th, what do I write on my user page? Robbydillallo (talk) 11:34, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
- You may make the disclosure on your user page. (User:Robbydillallo) 331dot (talk) 11:07, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
Your thread has been archived
[edit]
|
Hello Robbydillallo! The thread you created at the Teahouse, You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please .
See also the help page about the archival process.
The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing |
Your submission at Articles for creation: Plagiarismcheck.org (May 22)
[edit]- in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
- reliable
- secondary
- independent of the subject
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Plagiarismcheck.org and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.