User talk:Roc1233

Your submission at Articles for creation: St Marys Cement (March 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by NiftyyyNofteeeee was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
• reliable
• secondary
• strictly independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Desperately lacks reliable sources, not meeting NCORP

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:St Marys Cement and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

NiftyyyNofteeeee (talk) 15:36, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Roc1233! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! NiftyyyNofteeeee (talk) 15:36, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Padre Raffaele of Sant'Elia a Pianisi (March 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sophisticatedevening was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Padre Raffaele of Sant'Elia a Pianisi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sophisticatedevening ^(talk) 23:31, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Colavita (surname) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Colavita (surname). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources and it is a set index containing only non-notable people. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 08:54, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

thank you Roc1233 (talk) 15:26, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Roc1233! Your additions to Montenero di Bisaccia have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

• Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
• Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
• Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's eligibility.
• Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § Licensing.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 19:51, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Padre Raffaele of Sant'Elia a Pianisi has been accepted

Padre Raffaele of Sant'Elia a Pianisi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Atlantic306 (talk) 20:57, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

woohoo thanks atlantic Roc1233 (Talk | Edits) 21:59, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Paolo Gamba, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Madonna del Carmelo. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:57, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello Roc1233! Welcome to Wikiproject Christianity! Thank you for joining. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! - Sheriff U3 02:16, 8 April 2025 (UTC) [reply] Getting Started General • Task for You Wikiproject Talk Page • Templates Useful Links Project Category Christianity Portal Miscellaneous Featured Articles • Good Articles Did You Know? • Work Groups Anabaptist • Core Topics • Christianity in India Jesus • Syriac Christianity Projects Article Requests • Destubbing Campaign Assessment • Articles Needing Clean-up Peer Review • Adopted Topics Similar WikiProjects Anglicanism • Bible • Reformed Christianity Roman Catholicism • Lutheranism

I think you maybe interested in our sub-project Catholicism. Anyways welcome to the project!

Invitation to WikiProject Catholicism

Hello Roc1233! Thank you for your contributions to articles related to Catholicism. I would like to invite you to WikiProject Catholicism, a WikiProject dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to the Catholic Church, including the Latin Church, and the Eastern Catholic Churches in communion with the Pope in Rome. If you wish to participate, you can sign up at our member's list, or feel free to ask for assistance on our talk page any time. Thanks again for your contributions! Sheriff U3 02:16, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sure I'll join Roc1233 (Talk | Edits) 12:49, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Anachronistic papal images

Hey Roc1233, just to let you know that anachronistic images of popes in general, and Portraits from Saint Paul Outside the Walls in particular, are generally discouraged per Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Catholicism/Archive 2020#RfC on non-contemporary images of popes. See also WP:PORTRAIT for a different explanation of this general point of view. Cakelot1 ☞️ talk 21:13, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know I was unaware. I'll be reverting the ones which haven't been reverted. Roc1233 (Talk | Edits) 21:14, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Question: are images such as the one on pope valentine acceptable? Roc1233 (Talk | Edits) 01:35, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'd been procrastinating making a decision about this set of images for a while, as it's not from the immediately recognizable (and specifically single out in the above discussion) The Lives and Times of the Popes or St Paul Outside the Walls. I think I'm generally now coming to the opinion to remove, as the Ritratti dei romani pontefici seems very similar to Lives and Times, in its imaginary depictions. Cakelot1 ☞️ talk 09:31, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The sorts of images we'd generally be looking for are conventionalized hagiographic art or typical devotional images (i.e. Pope Anicetus, Pope Soter), notable artworks, or else artworks by notable artists (i.e. Pope Sergius I) or obviously stylized (e.g. manuscript/miniature) depictions, where its unlikely for the viewer to be miss-led in to thinking this is an accurate depiction (i.e. Pope Callixtus II, Pope Damasus I [with the more contemporaneous the better]).

What we want to avoid is random imaginary (yet realistic looking) non notable illustrations by non-notable 19th c. artists, based on absolutely nothing, drawn only so there was a complete set of portraits in a long forgotten non-notable book, and which (probably) looked nothing like the people depicted.

Obviously this can be a bit subjective, but WP:PORTRAIT covers this general approach better than I could. Cakelot1 ☞️ talk 09:48, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Roc1233 (Talk | Edits) 12:47, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dunton Tower has been accepted

Dunton Tower, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 00:43, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Roc1233 (Talk | Edits) 00:44, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: St Marys Cement (April 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by BuySomeApples was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
• reliable
• secondary
• strictly independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:St Marys Cement and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

BuySomeApples (talk) 21:21, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The World Destubathon

You are invited to participate in The World Destubathon. It's currently planned for June 16-July 13, partly due to me having hayfever during that period and not wanting to run it throughout July or August in the hotter summer and will be run then unless multiple editors object. There is currently $3338 going into it, with $500 the top prize. As 250 countries and entities is too much to patrol, entries will be by user, but there is $500 going into prizes for editors covering the most countries. Sign up if interested! ♦ Dr. Blofeld

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Balkans or Eastern Europe, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

TylerBurden (talk) 18:04, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Capradosso moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Capradosso. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Opm581 ^{(talk | he/him)} 02:21, 20 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

Thanks for your article on Antoine Kowalczyk!

Florificapis (talk) 20:08, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

thanks :D Roc1233 (Talk | Edits) 20:14, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: St Marys Cement (July 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WeirdNAnnoyed was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
• reliable
• secondary
• strictly independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

I'm not seeing significant secondary coverage of this company. Most sources cited are just routine reporting. The Canadian Mining Journal piece (Ref. 8) is good, but that's the only one in sight. Typically two secondary sources like this are a bare minimum for WP:NCORP, and for an article of this length I would expect more than two.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:St Marys Cement and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 11:39, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Colavita (surname)

Hello, Roc1233. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Colavita (surname), a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:06, 17 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on List of World Heritage Sites in Djibouti

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page List of World Heritage Sites in Djibouti, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 23:37, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Colavita (surname)

Hello, Roc1233. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Colavita".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:27, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note for new pages which are a part of series

Thanks for creating List of World Heritage Sites in Djibouti but the layout there isn't that good. I am not telling you to fix it yourself but if you see other Lists of World Heritage Sites which are also Featured lists, then you can notice that they all use a certain type of format. If you copied this format for the Djibouti list, it would be better because it came about as a process of consensus so that it had the least amount of irrelevant information, the most amount of relevant information, and it is also more accessible due to table captions. If you again create lists which are a part of a series, like Visa requirements for citizens of x country or list of Michelin star restaurants in xcountry, then please keep this advice in mind. Nonetheless, thanks for the article. 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩 Easternsahara 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩 21:49, 20 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Funnily enough, I did copy the layout from a different list of World Heritage Sites. Roc1233 (Talk | Edits) 23:25, 20 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Capradosso

Hello, Roc1233. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Capradosso, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:09, 20 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:St Marys Cement

Hello, Roc1233. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:St Marys Cement, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:08, 25 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Canada 10,000 Challenge ninth anniversary

		The Red Maple Leaf Award
		This maple leaf is awarded to Roc1233 for writing two articles during the ninth year of The 10,000 Challenge of WikiProject Canada. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Reidgreg (talk) 21:05, 26 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

thank you my friend Roc1233 (Talk | Edits) 22:13, 26 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Capradosso

Hello, Roc1233. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Capradosso".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:22, 20 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:St Marys Cement

Hello, Roc1233. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "St Marys Cement".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 12:24, 25 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]