Wiki Article

User talk:Untae

Nguồn dữ liệu từ Wikipedia, hiển thị bởi DefZone.Net

Your submission at Articles for creation: Perso AI Dubbing (February 25)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 11:59, 25 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for reviewing the submission and for the detailed feedback.
I understand the current references do not demonstrate sufficient independent,
in-depth coverage. I am actively working to obtain coverage from international
tech media outlets before resubmitting.
Could I ask for guidance — would coverage from sources such as TechCrunch,
VentureBeat, or similar English-language technology publications qualify as
appropriate secondary sources under Wikipedia's notability criteria?
I appreciate your time and patience. Untae (talk) 05:39, 26 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Untae! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 11:59, 25 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Perso AI Dubbing has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Perso AI Dubbing. Thanks! guninvalid (talk) 05:05, 27 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Perso AI Dubbing (February 27)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nil NZ was:
Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Wikipedia guidelines prohibit the use of LLMs to write articles from scratch. In addition, LLM-generated articles usually have multiple quality issues, to include:
Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
There are some statements that appear hallucinated, or are not entirely supported by the cited source. For example, none of the sources say "33 languages", & source [3] doesn't mention MP4's etc. Other likely AI tells include the promotional tone, list formatting (instead of prose), and random mark-up. Please resubmit the draft, without the use of an LLM.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.
nil nz 05:19, 27 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Perso AI Dubbing (February 27)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
GPTZero says highly confident this text was 100% AI generated.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 07:57, 27 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]