Wiki Article
User talk:Donenne
Nguồn dữ liệu từ Wikipedia, hiển thị bởi DefZone.Net
Welcome
[edit]
|
Donenne, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]
|
Hi Donenne! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Osarius (I'm a Teahouse host) This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:20, 26 September 2015 (UTC) |
December 2016
[edit]
Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Talk:Kek (mythology). Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. I see you've been warned for this before. Doug Weller talk 19:35, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
- There was no personal attack. --Donenne (talk) 03:41, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
- There most assuredly was.
- There was no personal attack. --Donenne (talk) 03:41, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]
Hello, Donenne. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
August 2018
[edit]
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Philip Green, you may be blocked from editing. Roxy, the dog. barcus 05:20, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Philip Green. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 07:49, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
Last warning
[edit]You are edit warring to include inappropriate material in a WP:BLP and posting aggressive and insulting edit summaries[1] and templates, accusing another user of various ridiculous stuff. I did a double take when I saw this version: "inside his daughter"?? Do you kiss your mother with that mouth? Anything like any of that again, and you will be blocked. Bishonen | talk 08:49, 19 August 2018 (UTC).
- Sorry Bish but how is that edit summary aggressive? In what world can citing Wikipedia Policy to a user in an edit summary in order to avoid them from vandalising an article be considered aggressive? Physically assaulting someone is aggressive. Shouting verbal abuse and threatening someone's life is aggressive.This edit summary is not aggressive. Secondly, I thought I had written inside a relationship with his daughter, and I corrected the mistake once it was reverted. I think you need to start assuming some WP:GOODFAITH. --Donenne (talk) 09:03, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
- In a world where the user you called a vandal is just upholding wikipedia policy. Read WP:BLP again (ha), wp:vandal and wp:npa though I suspect you know them very well. -Roxy, the dog. barcus 09:58, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
- Sorry Bish but how is that edit summary aggressive? In what world can citing Wikipedia Policy to a user in an edit summary in order to avoid them from vandalising an article be considered aggressive? Physically assaulting someone is aggressive. Shouting verbal abuse and threatening someone's life is aggressive.This edit summary is not aggressive. Secondly, I thought I had written inside a relationship with his daughter, and I corrected the mistake once it was reverted. I think you need to start assuming some WP:GOODFAITH. --Donenne (talk) 09:03, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
- Oh, you didn't physically assault Roxy, you only implied he had hidden nefarious reasons for removing your BLP violation ("Just because you might know Phillip Green IRL")? That's obviously fine then. And you say "inside his daughter" was a typo for "inside a relationship with his daughter", which isn't even English. See, that I do not believe. AGF is not a suicide pact. Don't do it again. Bishonen | talk 10:15, 19 August 2018 (UTC).
- English is not my first language though it is my preferred language for correspondence. Try using Hebrew. --Donenne (talk) 10:45, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
- Varför skulle jag använda hebreiska? Det här är ju engelska Wikipedia. Bishonen | talk 15:26, 19 August 2018 (UTC).
- For the record, I do not know Green IRL. I cannot remember if I have edited this article, though it is quite possible. I have strong opinions about him. -Roxy, the dog. barcus 17:39, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
- Varför skulle jag använda hebreiska? Det här är ju engelska Wikipedia. Bishonen | talk 15:26, 19 August 2018 (UTC).
- English is not my first language though it is my preferred language for correspondence. Try using Hebrew. --Donenne (talk) 10:45, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
- Oh, you didn't physically assault Roxy, you only implied he had hidden nefarious reasons for removing your BLP violation ("Just because you might know Phillip Green IRL")? That's obviously fine then. And you say "inside his daughter" was a typo for "inside a relationship with his daughter", which isn't even English. See, that I do not believe. AGF is not a suicide pact. Don't do it again. Bishonen | talk 10:15, 19 August 2018 (UTC).
Note the special rules for biographies
[edit]
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have recently shown interest in living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect: any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or any page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. Bishonen | talk 10:18, 19 August 2018 (UTC).
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Donenne. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Donenne. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
File:Mullah Muhammad Rasul.jpg listed for discussion
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Mullah Muhammad Rasul.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ― Tartan357 Talk 04:00, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
A barnstar for you!
[edit]
|
The Original Barnstar |
| hi PersonFromPoland (talk) 13:38, 30 March 2025 (UTC) |
A barnstar for you!
[edit]
|
The Admin's Barnstar |
| hi PersonFromPoland (talk) 13:38, 30 March 2025 (UTC) |
A barnstar for you!
[edit]
|
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar |
| hi PersonFromPoland (talk) 13:39, 30 March 2025 (UTC) |
A barnstar for you!
[edit]
|
The Barnstar of Diligence |
| hi PersonFromPoland (talk) 13:39, 30 March 2025 (UTC) |
A barnstar for you!
[edit]
|
The Barnstar of Diplomacy |
| hi PersonFromPoland (talk) 13:39, 30 March 2025 (UTC) |
A barnstar for you!
[edit]
|
The Citation Barnstar |
| hi PersonFromPoland (talk) 13:39, 30 March 2025 (UTC) |
A barnstar for you!
[edit]
|
The Brilliant Idea Barnstar |
| hi PersonFromPoland (talk) 13:39, 30 March 2025 (UTC) |
A barnstar for you!
[edit]
|
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar |
| hi PersonFromPoland (talk) 13:40, 30 March 2025 (UTC) |
A barnstar for you!
[edit]
|
The Civility Barnstar |
| hi PersonFromPoland (talk) 13:40, 30 March 2025 (UTC) |
A barnstar for you!
[edit]
|
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar |
| hi PersonFromPoland (talk) 13:40, 30 March 2025 (UTC) |
A barnstar for you!
[edit]
|
The Editor's Barnstar |
| hi PersonFromPoland (talk) 13:40, 30 March 2025 (UTC) |
A barnstar for you!
[edit]
|
The Minor barnstar |
| hi PersonFromPoland (talk) 13:41, 30 March 2025 (UTC) |
A barnstar for you!
[edit]
|
The Half Barnstar |
| hi PersonFromPoland (talk) 13:41, 30 March 2025 (UTC) |
A barnstar for you!
[edit]
|
The No Spam Barnstar |
| hi PersonFromPoland (talk) 13:41, 30 March 2025 (UTC) |
Sudan Countryball for yuo huehue
[edit]
|
Sudancountryballexe |
| here's sudan ball for your editing on sudan wiki :D PersonFromPoland (talk) 13:41, 30 March 2025 (UTC) |
ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
December 2025
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Acroterion (talk) 13:05, 23 December 2025 (UTC)- You don't get to treat other editors and people with mental disability with open contempt. Acroterion (talk) 13:08, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
- Mental disability.. is that right @Jon698? I feel so exonerated. Donenne (talk) 13:32, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
- Don't dig the hole deeper. Acroterion (talk) 13:46, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
- Mental disability.. is that right @Jon698? I feel so exonerated. Donenne (talk) 13:32, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
ANI Case
[edit]
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Frequent Lack of Civility from User:Donenne. Jon698 (talk) Jon698 (talk) 05:05, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
December 2025
[edit]{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Mfield (Oi!) 05:09, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
Donenne (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
State the personal attack made. Donenne (talk) 05:15, 29 December 2025 (UTC) Again, where is the personal attack? You will have to be more specific, the first diff shows an entire paragraph I had written and the second diff shows me adding in a Youtube clip that was relevant to the discussion and catering to alternate learning styles beyond just reading hence 'if reading isn't your thing for whatever reason'. Since when is inclusion rewarded with punishment? Donenne (talk) 05:30, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
- Since you are asking for it to be spelled out for any unblocking admin... "Apologies, my silly little cognitively-impaired pet goldfish needed some attention so I couldn't respond to this immediately. It's a coincidence indeed but his name actually sounds the same as your username, it's just spelt differently!" is a poorly veiled personal attack that is far less clever than you appear to think it is. As is suggesting that someone can't read rather than addressing the underlying concern. That's the last response you will get out of me as the blocking admin, it's up to another admin to assess your unblock request. Mfield (Oi!) 05:38, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
- And what is the personal attack? I do indeed have a pet goldfish and they are indeed named 'Johnathan' and I affectionately referred to him as cognitively-handicapped as he is my pet, and needed attending to. Is 'Johnathan' not similar to 'Jon'? I felt it polite to let the user involved know why I had not replied to them in a timely manner and your interpretation of the second diff is well and truly off the mark. There seems to be an awful lot of bad-faith occurring on the part of yourself and a few other editors lately, and should it progress, I will be forced to circumvent it. Donenne (talk) 06:03, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I believe you know very well why you've been blocked. I think you were lucky to get away with a temporary block, and I'd suggest you sit this one out and think about what needs to change to avoid you getting blocked indef next. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:46, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
You have been blocked for an indefinite period of time
[edit]As per the block log, "Being a net negative to the project. Inability to function in a collaborative environment." Simply put, you don't belong here. If you can't work with others using a basic level of civility, you are a net negative to the project. Wikipedia is a collaborative project, and as such, you have to be able to work with others. You seen to have such distain, bordering on hatred, of other human beings, and as such, you are incompatible with our goals here. Your responses in your request to be unblocked cemented that. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 09:45, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
December 2025
[edit]
(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the Unblock Ticket Request System that have been declined leading to the posting of this notice.