User talk:Lui Editor

March 2025

Hello, I'm Mandelbr0t. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Religion in Algeria have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Mandelbr0t (talk) 23:08, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

June 2025

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Pahlavi Iran—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 12:38, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

but ok if i compressed this page without ' ' Lui Editor (talk) 12:51, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making abusive or otherwise inappropriate edit summaries or comments, as you did to Hong Kong. Your edit summary or comment may have been removed. Please communicate with civility and refrain from making personal attacks. Thank you. Remsense 🌈 论 16:22, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

what? you mean actually Lui Editor (talk) 16:24, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you do not understand what the above means or how it relates to your recent edit to Hong Kong, then I politely ask that you refrain from editing an English-language encyclopedia, since basic competence in English communication is necessary. Remsense 🌈 论 16:37, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

wtf?, im just making GDPs on 2025 not making more info, cuz idk english Lui Editor (talk) 17:12, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I will make it as clear as I can: if you call another editor an "idiot" or equivalent in an edit summary or anywhere else again, I'm going to ask an administrator to intervene. It is completely unacceptable: if you can't communicate to the extent you can abide by our civility policy, then it's not possible for you to contribute constructively. [[WP:Remsense 🌈 论 17:14, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

too wikipedia blocking accounts that making slurs on summary edits?, i said that because peoples are mostly annoying reverting my edits with official 2025 stats of country, that's why! Lui Editor (talk) 17:32, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You're not helping us, no matter how important you think the content is, if you can't do the bare minimum when speaking to your fellow editors. Remsense 🌈 论 17:33, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Lui Editor! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Turkish people several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Turkish people, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Rsk6400 (talk) 05:04, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

but why they're removing flags? Lui Editor (talk) 12:28, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

See MOS:FLAG. Remsense 🌈 论 20:10, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Lawangi Chilli (Series) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Lawangi Chilli (Series). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources, it needs more sources to establish notability and doesn't say much about the series itself – see MOS:TV for information that we usually include in articles about TV series. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ClaudineChionh (she/her · talk · email · global) 03:36, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Lawangi Chilli

Hello Lui Editor,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username ClaudineChionh, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, Lawangi Chilli, for deletion, because there's already a page about that topic at Lavangi Mirchi. Please don't be discouraged; we appreciate your effort in creating new articles. To avoid this in the future, consider using the search function to find pages that already cover what you want to write about.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|ClaudineChionh}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

ClaudineChionh (she/her · talk · email · global) 04:08, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Hey Man Bawre

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Hey Man Bawre. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Sukhachya Sarini He Man Baware. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Sukhachya Sarini He Man Baware. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. CycloneYoris ^talk! 04:24, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

what?

@ClaudineChionh: Lui Editor (talk) 04:42, 28 June 2025 (UTC), what's the ways to solve that? and restoring these pages[reply]

@Lui Editor, a couple of us have requested deletion of articles that you created because they duplicated existing articles. If you have anything new to add on those topics, you should work on the existing articles, not create new ones. In any case, make sure that you cite your sources whenever you add new information. ClaudineChionh (she/her · talk · email · global) 05:23, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome Lui Editor!

Hello Lui Editor. Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions!

I'm Ad Orientem, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.

Some pages of helpful information to get you started:

Introduction to Wikipedia

The five pillars of Wikipedia

Editing tutorial

How to edit a page

Simplified Manual of Style

The basics of Wikicode

How to develop an article

How to create an article

Help pages

What Wikipedia is not

Some common sense Dos and Don'ts:

Do be bold

Do assume good faith

Do be civil

Do keep cool!

Do maintain a neutral point of view

Don't spam

Don't infringe copyright

Don't edit where you have a conflict of interest

Don't commit vandalism

Don't get blocked

If you need further help, you can:

Ask a question

or you can:

Get help at the Teahouse

or even:

Ask an experienced editor to "adopt" you

Alternatively, leave me a message at my talk page or type {{Help me}} here on your talk page and someone will try to help.

There are many ways you can contribute to Wikipedia. Here are a few ideas:

Fight vandalism

Be a WikiFairy or a WikiGnome

Help contribute to articles

Perform maintenance tasks

Become a member of a project that interests you

Help design new templates

Subscribe and contribute to The Signpost

Translate articles from Wikipedias in other languages

To get some practice editing you can use a sandbox. You can create your own personal sandbox for use any time. It's perfect for working on bigger projects. Then for easy access in the future, you can put {{My sandbox}} on your user page. By the way, seeing as you haven't created a user page yet, simply click here to start it.

Please remember to:

Always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes ~~~~ at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to your talk page, and a timestamp.
Leave descriptive edit summaries for your edits. Doing so helps other editors understand what changes you have made and why you made them.

The best way to learn about something is to experience it. Explore, learn, contribute, and don't forget to have some fun!

Sincerely, Ad Orientem (talk) (Leave me a message) 05:03, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ad Orientem (talk) 05:03, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Vladislav Matić moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Vladislav Matić. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CycloneYoris ^talk! 09:50, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vladislav Matić (June 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Rambley were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vladislav Matić and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Rambley (talk) 12:29, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lui Editor! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Rambley (talk) 12:29, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vladislav Matić (June 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Rambley were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vladislav Matić and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Rambley (talk) 15:30, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ok, but what's fixes of it to publish it rn? Lui Editor (talk) 15:32, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vladislav Matić (July 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jannatulbaqi was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vladislav Matić and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Baqi:) (talk) 10:08, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

OOOOGOOOGOOGOGOOGOBOHOHHHH DAMN, BUT WHAT WORDS ILL PUT IF I EDIT AND THERES NOTHING HARMFUL OR BAD ON THIS PAGE??? Lui Editor (talk) 19:20, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Vladislav Matić moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Vladislav Matić. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. — GhostInTheMachine ^{talk to me} 20:34, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Kylie Page

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Kylie Page requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kylie Page. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CycloneYoris ^talk! 23:03, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

no, it's not the 1st article, but give me the main reason why you did remove this girl who making pornography movies 🎥 4 invaild reason? @CycloneYoris Lui Editor (talk) 23:15, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Whazzup

How are you doing? I see that you have already created many articles even though you only have a little over 100 edits under your belt. However, you are going way too fast, and I am worried that you will be scared away before you get the chance to be an experienced editor. I would recommend going to the WP:TEAHOUSE or WP:ADOPT to learn more about how we do things here on Wikipedia. I have a feeling that you have the potential to succeed here. The Knowledge Pirate (talk) 06:13, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Kylie Page

Hello Lui Editor, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Kylie Page, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kylie Page (2nd nomination).

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|JohnMizuki}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

JohnMizuki (talk) 21:36, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Václav Toužimský moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Václav Toužimský. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Annh07 (talk) 17:22, 4 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

i did republished the page and added sources Lui Editor (talk) 18:12, 4 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Julia Dingwort-Nusseck

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Julia Dingwort-Nusseck, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 21:22, 4 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sanjay Kapur

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sanjay Kapur requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sunjay Kapur (2nd nomination). When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Sooterout (talk) 05:32, 5 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Talking to others

I'm not sure how serious you are making comments like this, but other editors are likely to find it annoying, and may ask for you to be blocked. I recommend you try to be more serious in your interactions with other editors, to keep you out of trouble and so your arguments can be better understood. Does that make sense? Moneytrees🏝️(Talk) 18:34, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Luis Valoy

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Luis Valoy, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 00:39, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Chae Kook-hee

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Chae Kook-hee, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 01:44, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Jo Si-nae moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Jo Si-nae. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and it is promotional and reads like an advertisement. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. GoldRomean (talk) 01:55, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Song Young-chang moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Song Young-chang. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and it has too many problems of language or grammar. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. GoldRomean (talk) 01:57, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Lee Seo-hwan moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Lee Seo-hwan. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and it has too many problems of language or grammar. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. GoldRomean (talk) 01:57, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Chae Kook-hee moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Chae Kook-hee. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and it has too many problems of language or grammar. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. GoldRomean (talk) 01:58, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding my recent draftifications

Are these translations of existing articles in another language? If so, they need to be properly attributed; see Wikipedia:Translation. Let me know if you have any questions. Cheers, GoldRomean (talk) 01:59, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like you’ve made a lot of new pages, probably translated. Please make sure to read the link I’ve provided before making any more! GoldRomean (talk) 02:02, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WHY my 4 pages rom SQSEASON3 got drated? Lui Editor (talk) 02:03, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I’ve stated the reasons above. For example, Draft:Lee Seo-hwan is probably an unattributed translation, is filled with red links/broken templates that don’t exist, and is just a long promotional list of that actor’s appearances with little citations. GoldRomean (talk) 02:05, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ok i'll translate them and mmake them public again, don't try to remove my own new pages rom deaths in 2025 Lui Editor (talk) 02:09, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I highly recommend submitting through Wikipedia:Articles for creation instead of self-publishing, which can reduce the chances of your stuff being draftified/nominated for deletion again. GoldRomean (talk) 02:11, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

how to publish it Lee Seo-hwan Lui Editor (talk) 02:15, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I do not think you should publish it yet. It is still very promotional and lacks sources. (And, if not removed, the appearances section should have films in italics, not <<>>, per the manual of style.) GoldRomean (talk) 02:17, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

i removed 》 symbols, i want it published rn Lui Editor (talk) 02:33, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Submit by clicking the ‘submit button’ to send it to AfC. But, IMO, there are other problems than the brackets; ideally everything should be sourced or removed. GoldRomean (talk) 02:36, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Lee Sung-woo (actor) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Lee Sung-woo (actor). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CycloneYoris ^talk! 08:47, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

i added sources Lui Editor (talk) 13:55, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Lee Sung-woo (actor) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Lee Sung-woo (actor). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. GoldRomean (talk) 14:39, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The only source is IMDb; you’ve got to stop doing this or it may be considered disruptive. GoldRomean (talk) 14:39, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please review the documentation for this template, which states This template is NOT for newly created articles. Even with established articles, the template is used to alert editors of rapid changing edits, it is not used to advertise or confirm the death itself. - FlightTime (open channel) 16:22, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

what does that mean??? Lui Editor (talk) 16:43, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Attribution

Gerhard Fels appears to be a exact Google-translated copy of the German version. As I said before, you need to provide attribution if you are translating articles, or it may be a copyright violation. See WP:TRANSLATE for instructions and let me know if you have questions. (Also, this edit summary was not okay, see WP:OWN. You do not "own" any pages.) GoldRomean (talk) 21:05, 30 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Karel Malík

Hello Lui Editor, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Karel Malík, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karel Malík.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Dionysodorus}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Dionysodorus (talk) 12:09, 21 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

why this was planned to be deleted?, it has some inappropriate things there or some misinformations? Lui Editor (talk) 20:33, 21 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, if you would like to contribute to the deletion discussion, you need to do so at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karel Malík, not here. Also, if you want editors who post on your talk page to see your reply, you need to "ping" them by writing a link to their user name in the manner indicated in the comment above. Dionysodorus (talk) 11:51, 27 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kylie Page for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kylie Page is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kylie Page (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spartaz ^Humbug! 11:24, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It is dangerous page because of porN? Lui Editor (talk) 17:05, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Because it isnt notable except for the death. Spartaz ^Humbug! 20:25, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:01, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Vladislav Matić

Hello, Lui Editor. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Vladislav Matić, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.