User talk:TCBT1CSI

I found many of the edits you were making unconstructive. In addition to deleting so many pages and making a mockery of many other, I disagree you were having a balanced view of things. I saw you on multiple times remove and make a mockery of additions done in good faith with lot of supporting sources and hell bent of making a mockery of the article based on your press releases and edits without any neutrality which is want wikipedia claims to stand for. I therefore fear wikipedia is going into hands of editors like yourself who are pushing a certain agenda over truth and are not in any way editing content from a neutral, encyclopedic perspective.

I accept your criticism, as it only further demonstrates my point about how Wikipedia's integrity and ethical standards are being compromised. This behavior reinforces my concerns about the depth of bias and how you’re allowing these standards to erode. It’s unfortunate, as Wikipedia should be a space for balanced information, yet actions like these highlight the troubling direction things are heading. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 12:35, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I dont think this super editor is a neutral n editor by any standards. They have a hidden agenda, to destroy and distort pages. They don't stand for truth in any wild imagination but is a puppet working under the influence of unscrupulous and obnoxious elements who are liars andchave no regard for truth, they exist just to distort truth with their twisted and agenda.

It's a perfect example of power in the hands ofvevil people who revert even reasonable good faith edits backes by sources only to propagate their mischievous lies on pages 2409:4073:4D33:6C64:FF38:D11E:AF53:780A (talk) 01:52, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

????? Please write to me in simple English. Avoid copying and pasting responses from ChatGPT. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 08:42, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copy and pasting and vandalizing pages is your job you m@ron . You destructive, cunning agenda is visie to all. You are a fraud with evil schemes dusguising yourself as a wikipedia editor. You are not a neutral editor, you are a paid editor carrying out evil schemes and designs by your evil master . You are free to use chatgpt to learn more of this simoke english 2409:4073:4E15:CBEF:13B8:DC29:FFED:B59D (talk) 07:52, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have been making an effort to keep our conversation civil so far. However, if you persist in disturbing me, I may have to report your IP address, the page titled 'Signature Global,' which was referenced by you to target me, and any other pages associated with the involved ID to ANI. Consider this a polite warning. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 08:59, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WP:AN/I

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

Please see WP:ANI#Reporting user for the discussion. TarnishedPath^talk 10:58, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The ANI complaint about you is now at WP:ANI#Disruptive AfD nominations by TCBT1CSI. - EdJohnston (talk) 16:26, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I might have unknowingly upset some paid editors, but there's no need to reply. Still, I truly appreciate those who checked my edit history and made a fair decision. Thanks! TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 09:36, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality First, No Rush

Hi there, I hope you are doing well! I would kindly suggest taking a moment to pause and check things carefully before starting a deletion nomination. It would really help you if you looked at any past deletion discussions and read through the sources properly, as suggested by WP:BEFORE. And, please also try to review both on- and off-wiki sources before starting a new nomination.. There's no need to rush, as doing it right is more important than doing it fast. Thanks so much for your hard work. Charlie (talk) 16:42, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please slow down

Hi I see you’re bringing a lot of articles to AfD at once. Deletion discussions take a lot of editor time so it is generally best to avoid starting more than two or three a day. If you keep pumping them out at a high rate the risk is they just won’t get any engagement and the nominations will fail because of a lack of participation. There’s no deadline! All the best Mccapra (talk) 10:17, 30 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Cite Unseen September 2025 updates

Hello! Thank you for using Cite Unseen. We are excited to share details about a big update we just deployed. With grant support from Wikimedia CH, we've added several new features, including a citation filtering dashboard, settings dialog, support for localization, and the ability to easily suggest domain categorizations. Cite Unseen now also lives on Meta Wiki, as part of our effort to serve all Wikimedia projects. Our source lists are now also on Meta-Wiki, where they can be collaboratively edited by the community.

Please see our newsletter on Meta-Wiki for full details. If you have feature ideas, notice any issues with our new updates, or have any questions, please get in touch via our project talk page. Thank you!

From SuperHamster and SuperGrey, 05:43, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This message was sent via global message delivery. You received this message as you've been identified as a user of Cite Unseen. If you are not a Cite Unseen user, or otherwise don't want to receive updates in the future, you can remove yourself from our mailing list here.

Claim of excessive AfD

Please comment at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Concern about mass AfD nominations by TCBT1CSI with boilerplate comments. Do you know roughly how many articles you have nominated for deletion in, say, the last month? Do you know roughly what percentage of articles you nominate are actually deleted? It would be good if you could give some thoughts at the ANI report, not here. Johnuniq (talk) 06:07, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Johnuniq I came to know about the party late, but like the previous incident, I really appreciate everyone who reviewed my edit history and made a fair decision. Thank you! TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 10:11, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Claim of excessive AfD 2

Hi @TCBT1CSI:. How goes it. I saw that complaint. If you need any help with difficult Afd discussions, please ping me. scope_creep^Talk 19:58, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good work. scope_creep^Talk 20:10, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Scope creep as usual I might have unknowingly upset some paid editors. Thanks for your help, by the way. Normally, I just make nominations and stay out of it but recently there’s been a lot of canvassing going on, so I will need some help with that. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 10:09, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@TCBT1CSI: Right, i'll take a look at each as they come up. scope_creep^Talk 11:06, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@TCBT1CSI: Those companies that are public listed generally won't get deleted unless they are in a chronic state. I don't think you will be able to delete them. scope_creep^Talk 12:24, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Scope creep my goal isn’t to get any listed company page deleted. I just want to get the attention of editors who genuinely want to improve such pages, while also exposing the paid editors who are trying to manipulate. It’s a win-win both ways. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 12:50, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That is a good strategy!! scope_creep^Talk 13:06, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	It's sad that so many editors are disappointed with your AFD nominations. You have supported the encyclopedia by catching non-notable articles, even though a lot of people are annoyed by it (there are more complaints about you than appreciation and admiration.) You never deserved this hate. Thank you, ~Rafael (He, him) • talk • guestbook • projects 15:08, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Kbs987 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kbs987. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Moneytrees🏝️(Talk) 04:01, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]