Wiki Article

User talk:Tankishguy

Nguồn dữ liệu từ Wikipedia, hiển thị bởi DefZone.Net

User:Example User talk:Example User:Example/About me User:Example/Awards Special:Emailuser/Example Special:Prefixindex/User:Example/ Special:Contributions/Example User:Example/Gotcha! User:Example/Workshop
Home Talk About me Awards eMail Subpages Contributions All edits Guest Book Workshop

Tech News: 2025-44

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 19:28, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Talk before Delete

[edit]

hey mr.@Tankishguy u recently deleted my edits on ALEPPO article . I hope u dont do that again . Because ALEPPO doesn't have many sources online that i can use as a link in my edits .

So please sir do not remove any edits related to aleppo just because they dont have enough sources

What u deleted Zizthemiz (talk) 10:42, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

it's policy. Tankishguy 13:11, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
also, "doesn't have many sources online" is bullshit. Tankishguy 22:44, 11 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2025-45

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 19:31, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback granted

[edit]

Hi Tankishguy. After reviewing your request, I have enabled rollback on your account. Please keep the following things in mind while using rollback:

  • Being granted rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle or Ultraviolet. It just adds a [rollback] button next to a page's latest live revision. It does not grant you any additional "status" on Wikipedia, nor does it change how Wikipedia policies apply to you.
  • Rollback should be used to revert clear and unambiguous cases of vandalism only. Never use rollback to revert good faith edits. For more information about when rollback is appropriate, see Wikipedia:Rollback § When to use rollback.
  • Rollback should never be used to edit war, and it should never be used in a content-related dispute to restore the page to your preferred revision. If rollback is abused or used for this purpose or any other inappropriate purpose, the permission will be revoked.
  • Use common sense. If you're not sure about something, ask!

I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, and feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate use of rollback. If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin) and Wikipedia:Rollback. Good luck and thanks! ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 19:13, 7 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

bro thank you! Tankishguy 19:17, 7 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Glory to @Oshwah! VitorFriboquen :] (Talk) 19:03, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 10 November 2025

[edit]

Tech News: 2025-46

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 20:36, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Review before reverting/don't auto revert

[edit]

Looks like you are using an automated reversion program of some sort, which is leading you to revert good, accurate, and legitimate edits. Be sure to check what you're actually reverting before reverting an edit. And if you do feel a reversion is warranted, explain why. It is very clear to me that you are, at least on two recent edits, utilizing a program, not what should be a watchful and careful personal review of what you are reverting. Not trying to be confrontation, though, and hoping you'll see my point. All the best. ~2025-32598-86 (talk) 02:39, 11 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Did you just tell me that I'm using an automated reverting system? Tankishguy 02:41, 11 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
UV Is a edit reverting and warning script Tankishguy 02:42, 11 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2025-47

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 17:24, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Bruh

[edit]

I didn't do anything wrong mate. You think I was disrupting the space for BFDI, yet you didn't give proof. I suggest being quiet and think before you speak. Thank you Wikiman2230 (talk) 23:11, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Jesus. I did. Tankishguy 00:05, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Then where is your source? Wikiman2230 (talk) 00:06, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
SOURCE FOR WHAT? Tankishguy 00:07, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
For my disturbance? Wikiman2230 (talk) 00:08, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
holy crud, I WITHDREW Tankishguy 00:09, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Calm down please. You are acting very unprofessional towards me. Wikiman2230 (talk) 00:12, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Unprofessional? Tankishguy 00:13, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. And i think we should end this conversation here yeah? Wikiman2230 (talk) 00:14, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
yeah. Tankishguy 00:14, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Biographies request for comment

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:Neutral point of view on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

(replacing Yapperbot) SodiumBot (botop|talk) 23:30, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Biographies request for comment

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

(replacing Yapperbot) SodiumBot (botop|talk) 22:31, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Defying Physics101 (10:42, 23 November 2025)

[edit]

Hello, Tankishguy I have a question regarding the expantion of text accurately, could you tell me how to expand on texts while making them accurate. Thank You -Defying Physics101 --Defying Physics101 (talk) 10:42, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Defying Physics101 Finding sources is your top priority in that case. Tankishguy 14:36, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Zalioukstudies (13:40, 23 November 2025)

[edit]

Hi Tankishguy :) I hope you are well. I would like to ask you, when a Wiki page contains uncited anecdotal evidence, do you leave it there? I have other information which I could cite but I am hesitant to delete any work before mine ... Just wondering how you would approach that and if it is better to just cite what I can and leave the rest as it is.

Thank you!! --Zalioukstudies (talk) 13:40, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Zalioukstudies Take it out immediately. That stuff has no place on Wikipedia, thank you for asking Tankishguy 14:22, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Zalioukstudies remember to use good quality sources! Tankishguy 14:38, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
thank you for your help!! Zalioukstudies (talk) 19:23, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Can you link the link of your revert? Tankishguy 21:17, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
hey @Tankishguy, apologies i did not reply sooner - i was not sure what you meant by 'revert' and i am still learning about editing here, but now i understand you. i haven't altered the article yet but i will share with you once i do so. thanks again for your guidance. Zalioukstudies (talk) 16:41, 13 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2025-48

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 15:54, 24 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Original Barnstar
TY so much for the work you put into my user page; I did not have much time to redo my user page since some editors took out all of my hardwork (awwww); Thanks for the help! ColinCorgi (talk) 20:45, 25 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Question from RoyLyster on Catholic Church sex abuse cases in the United States (14:18, 27 November 2025)

[edit]

Hello, How do I delete a sentence? This one is inaccurate: "these cases were conspicuous due to the perceived leniency shown to offending clergy by church leadership and the Vatican." The Vatican showed leniency in all countries where abuse took place; this was not unique to the US. --RoyLyster (talk) 14:18, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

click the "edit" or "edit source" button and find the sentence. then delete it like you would on a sentence on an email. Tankishguy 18:12, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Umar.369 on Mari Indus (15:54, 28 November 2025)

[edit]

Hello I Can't Upload my lines in article. --Umar.369 (talk) 15:54, 28 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know why. Tankishguy 18:48, 28 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Keylux (02:01, 29 November 2025)

[edit]

I know this is a mundane question, but have I been doing a good job editing? --Keylux (talk) 02:01, 29 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Let me see... Tankishguy 02:02, 29 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Taking a quick glance, I see 0 reverted edits, a good sign. You may want to check out TWA, and check out This to see if any task is good for you! Tankishguy 02:08, 29 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concerns regarding gravedancing

[edit]

Hi @Tankishguy! First off, thanks for your work in countervandalism. I see you around a lot and your contributions have a great impact on this project :) I am a little concerned, though, about this comment as well as your edit to the LTA's talk page here. It might be temping for you to taunt banned users, but that's referred to here as WP:GRAVEDANCING and it isn't constructive. Any chance you might consider backing off of those kinds of comments? Thank you :) --tony 03:43, 30 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

sure, I did not know it was an LTA and wanted it to do better in the future. the first comment was a joke, and recieved well by the blocking admin, but I'll back off. Tankishguy 03:46, 30 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I also got Oshwah to run CU ;) Tankishguy 03:49, 30 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The LTA is Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/BMX On WheeIs, which is omnipresent. The user feeds on our reactions and any time we insult them it drives them to continue, which is why it's important we deny them the satistfaction ;) --tony 04:02, 30 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I've studied the guy for a time, never thought i was able to see him directly. Tankishguy 04:03, 30 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 1 December 2025

[edit]
  • Comix: Madness
    It could happen to anyone.

Tech News: 2025-49

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 18:56, 1 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Sheave (02:16, 2 December 2025)

[edit]

Hey Tankishguy. It looks like you’ve been assigned as my mentor. Do you have any advice for someone (me) just starting out with Wikipedia editing? Are there any important do’s and don’ts I should be mindful of? Thanks. --Sheave (talk) 02:16, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'll send you a good intro Tankishguy 03:22, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Chris Peyton (06:18, 2 December 2025)

[edit]

Make me a wikipedia page --Chris Peyton (talk) 06:18, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The thing about Wikipedia is that you make them yourself. See this on how to make the article you want. Tankishguy 06:21, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

New Term for micro economics.

[edit]

We went to publish a new term economics can anyone help? Melihbas28 (talk) 15:31, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Melihbas28 (15:33, 2 December 2025)

[edit]

Hello there my name is Melih,

I wanted to publish a new term in micro economics. Can anybody helps? --Melihbas28 (talk) 15:33, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Does it have reliable sources? Tankishguy 22:39, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Question from SoftTacoss (20:32, 3 December 2025)

[edit]

How do I publish a refined and cited article of anything I please? I would like a guide on how to do the codework and imagery. --SoftTacoss (talk) 20:32, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

see this. Tankishguy 20:33, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Raphael Wines (01:09, 4 December 2025)

[edit]

Hello, How can I create a citation and at point can I be able to contribute? --Raphael Wines (talk) 01:09, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

what Tankishguy 01:11, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
oh
see this Tankishguy 01:12, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
(talk page stalker) Hi Raphael Wines! See Help:Referencing for beginners, it teaches you how to add a citation in the source editor and there's a link to how to do it in the visual editor in that page as well. HurricaneZetaC 01:13, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Groovium (01:26, 4 December 2025)

[edit]

There's an image that's been used for a public figure that makes me 99% sure it's public domain, and I'd like to use it on the page. How do I make officially sure it's up for public grabs so I don't get in trouble? --Groovium (talk) 01:26, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm.... Not sure. You should probably ask the fellows over at Commons, They can probably help you out. Tankishguy 01:29, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Warning icon

The page Itaaly has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done for the following reason:

It met Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion under CSD R3.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. HurricaneZetaC 13:47, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Sophiadalzell (18:39, 4 December 2025)

[edit]

Can i make my edits anonymous, or do i have to stay signed out for that feature? --Sophiadalzell (talk) 18:39, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits are technically anonymous, either way. Tankishguy 01:20, 5 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Signed out, multiple special groups can access your IP, but signed in, only one can. Tankishguy 01:20, 5 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Question from CartierRecordsENT (19:32, 5 December 2025)

[edit]

How do i make an article public? --CartierRecordsENT (talk) 19:32, 5 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I seem to only be posting sketches or drafts or whatever I’m trying to make a public article that would pop up if somebody was to look up rich2solid on Google CartierRecordsENT (talk) 21:01, 5 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Only confirmed or autoconfirmed users can post articles. Tankishguy 22:38, 5 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Coolone67801 (11:56, 8 December 2025)

[edit]

Hello tankishguy! I see that base infinity is not in Wikipedia, firstly can you please make page about base infinity, also im firstly seen this on numberblocks band maked by fith2049, secondly almost all of my edits are gone soo can you please bring back all of my edits back (you can see all of my edits in view history), that's all I need bye! --Coolone67801 (talk) 11:56, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

no. Tankishguy 15:04, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2025-50

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 17:43, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Franchiskii (03:01, 10 December 2025)

[edit]

So I’m a rapper and i wanted to create my own information and about me. How can I do that? --Franchiskii (talk) 03:01, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Franchiskii: In general, you don't. See WP:AUTOBIOGRAPHY. Further, Wikipedia is not a social media platform and not a means to promote yourself. Unless there is significant coverage in reliable, secondary sources attesting to your notability, it's highly unlikely an article about you would be accepted here. See also WP:GNG/WP:NMUSICIAN. --Hammersoft (talk) 03:13, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, Hammersoft! Tankishguy 14:00, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Falcopunch145 (07:55, 10 December 2025)

[edit]

How do I format summaries of my changes? --Falcopunch145 (talk) 07:55, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

there should be a summary box. In general, just put what you did inside the box. Tankishguy 14:10, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

December 2025

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Kvinnen. I noticed that you recently removed content from Cà Mau province without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Kvinnen (talk) 14:30, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

removed promotional words Tankishguy 14:31, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

[edit]
Hello, Tankishguy!

I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.


The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.


The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help. Has a list of maintenance tasks you can do.

Tips
  • Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
  • It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
  • If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue on the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
  • Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
  • When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
  • If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
  • Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.
I welcomed myself. a sad reality of the fact wikipedia needs more people to welcome others and show them the ropes. Tankishguy 23:20, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Abumoh00 (21:29, 13 December 2025)

[edit]
Note: Abumoh00's mentor Bunnypranav is away.

Hey Bunny & Tankish. Thanks for your mentorship.

I've run into one editor in my short time editing (TarnishedPath), who went through my edit history to mass revert edits that I think are quite good or close to it. I was trying to figure out why, and after looking into it they seem to be explicitly critical or in support of certain articles/entities and their edit history/explanations shows a political POV.

Dealing with them has been exhausting, and after seeing others who have to deal with them, it looks like they only get more stubborn and in any somewhat politics-related article are unwilling to improve articles for the project, instead of pushing a specific view of the world.

How do I go about dealing with this? Is an interaction ban okay? If so, what does that entail? --Abumoh00 (talk) 21:29, 13 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I do not see any bias TarnishedPath (can you comment?) has by reverting your edits. from what I see, they are trying to help. This can be seen as an aspersion. Tankishguy 01:55, 14 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
we all have bias; I'm not alleging TarnishedPath is unique in that regard; their contributions from what I can see do push specific narratives, or are either pro and or against an entity rather than trying to reach a neutral assessment. I can provide links if needed but I'm not here to character judge; that observed bias was a side observation I made when trying to figure out why one editor was mass reverting my edits across articles and very difficult to engage with in finding common ground or addressing points I've raised (e.g., saying "I just disagree" without addressing good faith, logical points in talk pages).
--
Maybe it's just the inherent coldness of text communication (can't solve that :/), but I did not get the impression they want to work together; e.g., on the 'Canada's National Observer (CNO)' article I got the impression they're more inclined to just block any info that might be nuanced or critical of the org, citing policy like WP:Coatrack even though this is false on it's face (they wanted to remove a citation/text because the legal entity of CNO was referenced instead of CNO, even though that's how law works; you sue a legal entity, not the flagship/only publication of that entity); which, I think it's reasonable to say, along with the other evidence, easily gives the impression they aren't engaging in good faith (not saying they aren't; that's the impression these actions reasonably convey). Abumoh00 (talk) 02:06, 14 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Tankishguy, I'll comment when I'm back at home in front of my PC. @Abumoh00 as advised by Tankish, those are definetly asperions you're making about me and you need to strike your allegations against me. TarnishedPathtalk 02:07, 14 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Abumoh00, AFAIK I've only edited two articles which you have edited, Grokipedia and Canada's National Observer. Both of those articles have been on my watchlist for a while. You would have discovered that I had previously edited both if you cared to looked at my contribution histories for either respective articles. If you're going to make statements that I am going through your edit history and mass reverting everything you do, you need to support those sorts of accusations. Please read WP:AGF and WP:ASPERSIONS.
On the subject of your edits, you seem to be labouring under the misapprehension that once I've laid out my objections to an edit that I am moving forward obliged to answer every comment you make thereafter. That is simply not the case. In both instances I have given you policy based responses. If you don't like my responses, or think yours is better that is no reason to continue reverting to reintroduce your preferred versions. Either you obtain consensus or you don't. If you don't, it's really not the end of the world and there are various avenues to dispute resolution if you really do think I'm wrong. TarnishedPathtalk 03:52, 14 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
for sure; I reached out for a third opinion on them, as yes you're right no one can force anyone to explain their objections or respond to good-faith logical responses.
It is I think fair to hope that editors do though, lest to come across as stonewalling for a particular end (in this case pro-CNO, anti-Grok; when we should instead be looking for neutral evaluations of all).
You've edited a lot articles is my impression; my claim was that you *mass* reverted as opposed to trying to work together on improvements, did so immediately one after the other on articles I edited, cited policy to support points that as mentioned above (e.g., CNO vs. legal entity), quite reasonably can appear as bad-faith. Abumoh00 (talk) 04:00, 14 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
re: yes I've looked at your contribution histories; that's where I saw the history of edit wars, blunt dismissive engagements with others (maybe part of this is just text communication's lack of context however), and comments like:
"Of course a research piece for a American think tank is going to confuse left-wing with liberals. Calling the Democrats, who are strongly is support of capitalism and engage in continuous wars, left-wing is wrong-headed when considering global politics. That the research found positive sentiment for Scott Morrison (a conservative Australian former prime-minister) just makes a joke of the whole argument."
or here advocating for Jacobin and against well-respected (although Wiki editors do ahve methodoloical concerns) 3rd party media bias rater Ad Fontes: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia%3AReliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_467
It's fine to be left or right of liberal (or far left for that matter), but in my experience engaging with people further to the extremes becomes less productive because I don't see how a far left or far right person could consistently & easily see the world in an NPOV manner, or contribute to a staunchly non-political technical project like Wiki. Abumoh00 (talk) 04:26, 14 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Guavas111vh (03:08, 15 December 2025)

[edit]

Hello Sir, I want to create an Article about Professor NK Gourha, How should i do that --Guavas111vh (talk) 03:08, 15 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

see WP:YFA Tankishguy 03:10, 15 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2025-51

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 19:01, 15 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Trouted X2!

[edit]
a rainbow trout fish

Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.
a rainbow trout fish

Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

Tankishguy 23:06, 16 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Filing SPIs

[edit]

Hi Tankishguy. I noticed that most of the SPIs you have recently filed were declined for one reason or another. SPI is a fairly complex corner of the administrative section of the encyclopaedia; I'd suggest steering clear of it until you naturally gather some more experience through the course of editing. If you insist, I'd recommend at the very least reading various SPI instructionals, such as User:Blablubbs/How to file a good SPI. Thank you. DatGuyTalkContribs 12:32, 17 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Think big 001 (17:37, 17 December 2025)

[edit]

please mentor i am a musician and i wish to add my profile here please guide me --Think big 001 (talk) 17:37, 17 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

see WP:YFA and WP:AUTO Tankishguy 19:19, 17 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 17 December 2025

[edit]

Hello ,I want to ask before i publish,it can be approved by Wikipedia

Khronostasis

Khronostasis is an independent innovation-focused brand centered on the exploration of timeless systems, future-oriented thinking, and long-term technological vision. The brand explores how concepts of time, continuity, and progress influence innovation, strategic design, and emerging technologies.

Founded in the United States, Khronostasis positions itself at the intersection of futurism, systems thinking, and innovation philosophy, emphasizing durability, foresight, and relevance beyond short-term trends.

Overview

Khronostasis is built around the concept of timeless innovation, a framework that prioritizes sustainable ideas, forward-looking structures, and long-range impact. Rather than focusing on short-lived technological trends, the brand emphasizes principles intended to remain relevant across generations of technological change.

The name “Khronostasis” derives from the Greek words khrónos (time) and stásis (state or balance), reflecting the brand’s focus on continuity and equilibrium within innovation processes.

Philosophy and Approach

The brand’s philosophy centers on the belief that meaningful innovation requires a long-term perspective. Khronostasis promotes strategic thinking that integrates technological evolution, human systems, and future readiness.

Its conceptual approach combines elements of futurism, innovation strategy, and systems design, often addressing themes such as permanence, adaptability, and technological legacy.

Brand Identity

Khronostasis maintains a minimalist and futuristic identity, frequently associated with abstract representations of time, balance, and progress. Its visual and conceptual language is designed to avoid direct association with short-term design trends, reinforcing its emphasis on longevity and conceptual clarity.

Activities

Khronostasis engages in conceptual development, brand research, and innovation-oriented --Khronostasis (Timeless Innovation) (talk) 04:51, 19 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

this is WP:PROMOTION. Tankishguy 13:14, 19 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Think big 001 (13:10, 19 December 2025)

[edit]

i made an article on sandbox draft i have made tow changes after i publish on draft what should i do again --Think big 001 (talk) 13:10, 19 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I can't understand the grammar on this question. Tankishguy 13:17, 19 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
i meant to say i have mad an article on the sandbox draft and i wish to publish it soon Think big 001 (talk) 10:01, 20 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Can you link it? Tankishguy 14:02, 20 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Think_big_001/sandbox Think big 001 (talk) 15:30, 20 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
this draft is undeniably promotional. Tankishguy 17:32, 20 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Again, WP:YFA, WP:AUTO and WP:PROMO Tankishguy 17:34, 20 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Iberian-colchian on User:Iberianlover (07:19, 22 December 2025)

[edit]

I want change name top of --Iberian-colchian (talk) 07:19, 22 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

? I can't understand your meaning. Tankishguy 15:24, 22 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2025-52

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 21:43, 22 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Ziotheo (09:59, 24 December 2025)

[edit]

Why do people don't like my edits when im telling the truth --Ziotheo (talk) 09:59, 24 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Invangelist (15:33, 24 December 2025)

[edit]

Hi. I was wondering if it's possible for me to create a page about in-house creative agencies. I write and speak extensively on this topic, and noticed that there isn't a page dedicated to this topic.

Any assistance would be greatly appreciated! --Invangelist (talk) 15:33, 24 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Happy holidays!

[edit]
Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings}} to send this message

Question from Jason Valkyri (16:14, 26 December 2025)

[edit]

Hello Tankishguy!

Thank you for being my mentor. As I start editing, I'm very curious about the "behind-the-scenes" quality control.

Could you explain what an entry or a major revision typically goes through? For instance, once I publish an edit, does it undergo a formal internal review process by a group of editors, or is it more of a decentralized peer-monitoring system? I often see notices about articles being "checked" or "refined" multiple times—is there a specific lifecycle for an entry to be considered "verified"?

I'm eager to learn how to better collaborate with the community to ensure my contributions meet Wikipedia's high standards. Thanks again for your time! --Jason Valkyri (talk) 16:14, 26 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The answer to your first question is that it's a peer monitoring system. The answer to your second question is That new articles are checked through review processes such as Articles for Creation Or New Page Patrol. Past that there is some further content review, being, in order of quality, Peer Review, Did you know, And Good or Featured articles. Featured articles and Did you know are on the main page. Tankishguy 04:43, 28 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry for getting back to you after so long. Tankishguy 04:44, 28 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Tankishguy,
Thank you so much for the detailed insights! Your explanation of the "peer monitoring system" and the different quality tiers really helped me understand the decentralized nature of Wikipedia.
I am planning to focus my contributions on Richard Wagner. Given your expertise in AV work, I would love to ask: Does Wikipedia generally support embedding audio or video files directly within an entry, or are there specific technical hurdles I should be aware of?
Furthermore, I’m curious about the community's efforts in restoring classical music archives. Are there ongoing AV restoration projects for historical recordings by masters like Furtwängler, Toscanini, or Karajan? I’d love to know how Wikipedia manages the copyright and technical restoration for such significant cultural heritages.
Looking forward to your professional perspective!
Best regards, Jason Valkyri Jason Valkyri (talk) 09:14, 29 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
(talk page stalker) Jason Valkyri Please do not use LLMs to write your responses. Many editors who prefer to talk to humans view it as disrespectful. See WP:LLMTALK. HurricaneZetaC 20:12, 29 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Exactly. Tankishguy 21:15, 29 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry,Tankishguy.I was not farmiliar with the rules,and I am afraid to make misunderstanding.So would you please teach me about the problems?I am a real people. Jason Valkyri (talk) 01:35, 30 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I didnt realize it was a LLM. Scary Wikiman2230 00:47, 30 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
sorry for that,frankly speaking,I am not a English native speaker,and I am a freshman to Wiki.I heard the famous wiki since I was a child,also I really respect the Big Shot like Tankishguy and HurricaneZeta.So I just want to be more polite and serious through gemini'polishment.Really sorry for that and I promise I would not use AI anymore.Thanks for everyone's notice! Jason Valkyri (talk) 01:28, 30 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'm glad your apologizing for your misuse of Artificial Intelligence on the English Wikipedia. By any chance, what language do you speak? Wikiman2230 01:29, 30 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks,well,my native language is Chinese.And I realize that the big problem of Chinese Wikipedia named Baidu.Propaganda and misleading buried countless truth,Baidu is not reliable at all.So I really appreciate Wikipedia repect the truth,freedom and equality!So Wikipedia means very important to me.I especially admire the quality of Wikipedia-objectivity and rigor,and I also want to spread it. Jason Valkyri (talk) 05:15, 30 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Jason Valkyri so, you know that little en prefix on the website domain? replace the en with zh, and that's how you get to the chinese wikipedia. you do have to use a vpn, though. Tankishguy 05:18, 30 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your suggestion,I will do this! Jason Valkyri (talk) 05:30, 30 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Jason Valkyri That's good that you won't use AI, but there are other language Wikipedias. You can find the Wikipedia in your native language and contribute there - while this is the highest viewed version of Wikipedia, there are active communities and readers of other language Wikipedias that will appreciate your work, especially if your version of Wikipedia isn't completely fleshed out and needs some help.
None of us here are "big shots" or anything, we try to promote equality and don't have any extra say in discussions regarding various things around here. HurricaneZetaC 01:42, 30 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your suggestion,HurricaneZeta!I will help to build English and Chinese Wiki,and I am very eager to learn from you all,please give me more guidance in the future. Jason Valkyri (talk) 05:26, 30 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Jason Valkyri quick sidenote, we do not call wikipedia "wiki", instead we usually attach the ISO language code if we're talking about wikipedia, as a wiki is a type of website. Tankishguy 05:29, 30 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
OK,I understand,Tankishguy,I know it should called en.wikipedia and ch.wikipedia.Thanks for the teaching. Jason Valkyri (talk) 05:35, 30 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Jason Valkyri that only applies if you're talking about one wikipedia inside of another wikipedia Tankishguy 05:36, 30 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Got it,Thanks! Jason Valkyri (talk) 05:47, 30 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Neerajkannz on The Sports Hub (04:08, 29 December 2025)

[edit]

Lot of options are not visible while I try to edit a wikipedia page using my smartphone --Neerajkannz (talk) 04:08, 29 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sadly, there is nothing I can do about that. If you have a computer, The absolute best thing you can do is edit from that. Tankishguy 05:44, 29 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Question from ThePlaneWikiGuy (23:01, 29 December 2025)

[edit]

I'm making a wiki article in my sandbox. The main idea is about an airport in Indonesia, called "Kiwirok Airport". Its a famous airport for its small, and curved runway. The runway is curved due to the short amount of space where it is, which is on a mountain. Is there anyway I can add stuff to my article? --ThePlaneWikiGuy (talk) 23:01, 29 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Coolone67801 (18:14, 30 December 2025)

[edit]

I researched and limit of calculator on android maded by GOOGLE LLC has limit of 2^250,000, if you see my requests,


Ultimate list of numbers soon :) --Coolone67801 (talk) 18:14, 30 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Question from GodlyOutput (18:00, 3 January 2026)

[edit]

I am attempting to edit stuff about Venezuela as our President made announcements and people have put the wrong information over the operation & Venezuela’s Page needs to be edited to say Under US occupation. --GodlyOutput (talk) 18:00, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

GodlyOutput that's because the page is protected. I am not checking to what extent. Tankishguy 18:05, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Plspain (18:24, 9 January 2026)

[edit]

Hey! I wanted to Edit the Poland page and replace the anthem by the official instrumental version instead of the US Navy band. Please help me how to do it. Thanks! --Plspain (talk) 18:24, 9 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Plspain generally on wikipedia, we use US Navy band recordings as a kind of unwritten rule. I couldn't tell you why. Tankishguy 08:51, 11 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2026-03

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 19:31, 12 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Question from GrampsDrew (20:28, 14 January 2026)

[edit]

I was looking to add sources to the page for "Objective Media Group" (link attached), and the history section starts with the date of the founding of the company, and that seemed simple enough to verify. My immediate thought was to look up business records for the incorporation of the company, and I found them. Is that a good source? If so, how would that be cited?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Objective_Media_Group --GrampsDrew (talk) 20:28, 14 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Biographies request for comment

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Nick Shirley on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

(replacing Yapperbot) SodiumBot (botop|talk) 02:30, 15 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 15 January 2026

[edit]

Question from Artemis343 (21:50, 16 January 2026)

[edit]

Hi, sorry but I have a question regarding the image editting. I found a wrong (or at least very confusing) image. Some ppl already noticed that before me and wrote about it in the comments, but eventhough that was almost a year ago now, the picture is still there. I would like to replace it with a correct scheme picture, but I am not sure whether I can do that or if someone with more seniority has to do that, especially since it on a rather big and important page (it is the first scheme picture on the Atomic number page). --Artemis343 (talk) 21:50, 16 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Artemis343 the first question I am going to ask is if it has a lock of any color on the top right, if you view using a computer? Tankishguy 21:54, 16 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
no I don't see any lock on the page Artemis343 (talk) 21:58, 16 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@Artemis343 then you should be able to just make a new image and replace it Tankishguy 21:59, 16 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
perfect! thanks so much Artemis343 (talk) 22:19, 16 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@Artemis343 you're welcome Tankishguy 22:20, 16 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Rilwan2025 (05:42, 17 January 2026)

[edit]

I would like to create a Wikipedia page for a public figure. Could you help me guide through it --Rilwan2025 (talk) 05:42, 17 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

see WP:YFA Tankishguy 00:51, 18 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Question from ShantanuARajurkar (22:04, 17 January 2026)

[edit]

I am finding it difficult to add Tables in my article, please help --ShantanuARajurkar (talk) 22:04, 17 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Simo officiel (16:59, 18 January 2026)

[edit]

كيف أقوم بإنشاء مرجع ؟ --Simo officiel (talk) 16:59, 18 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

إذا كنت تستخدم محررًا مرئيًا، فانقر فوق الزر الذي يحمل عبارة "cite"، والصق الرابط إلى موقع الويب المذكور، ثم انقر فوق "create" (كملاحظة جانبية، يرجى استخدام ويكيبيديا العربية إذا لم تتمكن من التواصل أو إضافة محتوى باللغة الإنجليزية، على ar.wikipedia.org Tankishguy 20:17, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Just a note, I do not know Arabic at all, And I used Google Translate. Tankishguy 20:17, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Dawgs.html on The Pop Manifesto (15:30, 19 January 2026)

[edit]

Hello, how do I cite something and is there a way to do it properly? Any tips? --Dawgs.html (talk) 15:30, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

If you are using visual editor, there should be a button That says cite. Input the link to your citation, and click create. That's the simplest way to do it. Tankishguy 20:05, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2026-04

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 20:28, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Dannymanic (23:13, 21 January 2026)

[edit]

I would like to create a page for myself --Dannymanic (talk) 23:13, 21 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]