User talk:Waffine

July 2025

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Dakhla, Western Sahara, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. M.Bitton (talk) 14:43, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Waffine, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum, see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! – LuniZunie ツ_(talk) 15:59, 1 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

November 2025

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Talk:Morocco. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Skitash (talk) 20:32, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Its very obvious he has a bias he shouldnt be allowed to be an editor with such a bias many of my family members were murdered by the polisario that is why i feel so strongly they murdered my dad. Waffine (talk) 20:37, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Also please take a look at why because he dismissed my factual UN evidence because of how biased he is. Waffine (talk) 23:10, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war, according to the reverts you've made to Morocco. This means that you are repeatedly reverting content back to how you think it should be, despite knowing that other editors disagree. Once it is known that there is a disagreement, users are expected to collaborate with others, avoid editing disruptively, and try to reach a consensus – rather than repeatedly reverting the changes made by other users.

Important points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive behavior – regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not engage in edit warring – even if you believe that you are right.

You need to discuss the disagreement on the article's talk page and work towards a revision that represents consensus among everyone involved. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution if discussions reach an impasse. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to engage in edit warring, you may be blocked from editing. M.Bitton (talk) 01:50, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at User talk:Waffine. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. M.Bitton (talk) 01:52, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not a single user attack was made agaisnt you. You told me to go pick up a dictionarry which should be demed as a personal attack on me like are you serious 🤦 Waffine (talk) 01:57, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple personal attacks, including this one on your talk page. M.Bitton (talk) 02:00, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Does not count as a personal attack for the bias has been greatly towards in favor of the Polisario ground which can be seen via responses i am just confused and clarification I can also constitute yours for multiple personal attacks also Waffine (talk) 02:02, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

you know what you seem to be a veteran at this stuff ill stop pestering you with all my edits and stuff please just keep and open mind this stuff means a lot to me from all the things that those people did to my family. Im sorry if I insulted you. Waffine (talk) 02:09, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

However i would like to note throughout many articles its apparent that you are biased and wikepedia will not take nice to it i can see through articles regarding tagine the sahara its aparent Waffine (talk) 02:21, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

where is the response now I made some rather good points I dont know how to respond without opening a new one Waffine (talk) 00:20, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 03:39, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

is this to me? Waffine (talk) 03:41, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please read the previous things i stated please i beg of you Waffine (talk) 00:21, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Waffine (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

It is absolutely absurd that I would be blocked due to showing how someone is biased on multiple instances throughout many websites regarding morocco be it food culture or anything this user has constantly being against morocco not once have I threatened him and I even went to apologize being banned wrongfully is such a shame Waffine (talk) 03:46, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

WP:NOTTHEM, also you must request unblocking at your original account. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 06:37, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Waffine (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

So you guys won't unblock my account because of an account I have never heard of? I never ever have seen that account and that account is older than me I am 17 years old how would I have an account thay old like are we serious? I dont need to request to get unbanned on my account because thats not my account. You guys are showing how unprofessional and biased you guys are by just keeping things like these happening. Investigate the guy who clearly holds a bias against morocco to the point its spoken about on numerous reddit threads.🤦🤦 Waffine (talk) 14:34, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

One open unblock request at a time, please; you abusively had two. Clear sockpuppetry which you even admitted to, here. I'm not sure why you think we are stupid but it isn't working out for you. Yamla (talk) 15:39, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Waffine (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not using both accounts I just wasn't logged in on my computer and when I got logged in I immediately stopped using the other one tell me where on the terms of service does it say that. Let's just also ignore the baised based writing that I called out because that doesnt seem important like are we serious🤦 I wasn't logged in and when I logged in I ditched the account because it wasn't an account? Waffine (talk) 16:19, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

See response below. Sir Sputnik (talk) 22:28, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Waffine (talk) 16:19, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Waffine (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I want you to please here my side of the story I do not want to sound like a b word or a bad person at all but here are my issues. Looking into it I am going to admit that other account was mine. I was not logged in on it and I was using that to respond until I logged in. However when I logged in that account was no longer used. The issue is that username M.Bitton clearly holds a bias against Morocco. A simple look through his account would show such bias that is held. You can see the first English wikepedia change be in favor of Algeria. Also his edits does not span throughout just regarding the Western Sahara conflict but also against culturally Moroccan things. It is a shame that wikepedia has gotten to the point where I have to go on and defend myself against someone who clearly holds a bias an an amount of power to the point where all changes in a page regarding something where he has a bias against goes through him. That is not fair. Of course I would get upset. However accusing me of hailing personal insults when I simply wanted to express my viewpoint and thus being told to pick up a dictionary like I am some stupid is not nice at all. There cant be anything done anyways because of his 13 year status. I even went to apologize to him also too accepting whatever he does because regardless of what is done it cannot be changed because everything runs through him. Look into my appeal please but also look into the type of edits he is making too please just take a look that is all. Thank you Waffine (talk) 20:17, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Would like to add ro furthermore back my evidence of said bias being his first Enflish wikepedia edits literally being on the Algerian War and the Sand War it is shamful that i would get banned when he also does state insults at me via insulting my intelligence saying to pick up a dictionary. This guy clearly holds a bias and his account should be investigated over the ban not me. You should have an unbiased person be able to change a website not somebody from a place where they hold the biggest grudge against mororco

Decline reason:

You've been told previously to not open multiple unblock requests at once, and that you would need to focus on your editing, not that of others. Any further unblock requests along the same lines, focusing primary on other people's editing will likely just result your access to this page being revoked. Sir Sputnik (talk) 22:28, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Waffine (talk) 20:17, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) I have repaired the wikicode on one of your requests and moved them both to the bottom of the page - this is where administrators will be looking for them. Meadowlark (talk) 20:28, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you that is very nice of you. Waffine (talk) 20:31, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]