↑Rahman, A.K.A., 1989. Freshwater fishes of Bangladesh. Zoological Society of Bangladesh. Department of Zoology, University of Dhaka. 364 p.
↑Shrestha, T.K., 1990. Resource ecology of the Himalayan waters. Curriculum Development Centre, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal. 645 p.
↑Ahmed, M., 1991. A model to determine benefits obtainable from the management of riverine fisheries of Bangladesh. ICLARM Tech. Rep. 28, 133 p.
↑Al-Mamun, A., 2003. A hand guide for identification of inland fishes of Bangladesh. WorldFish Centre-Bangladesh.
↑Kapoor, D., R. Dayal i A.G. Ponniah, 2002. Fish biodiversity of India. National Bureau of Fish Genetic Resources Lucknow, Índia. 775 p.
↑Monkolprasit, S., S. Sontirat, S. Vimollohakarn i T. Songsirikul, 1997. Checklist of Fishes in Thailand. Office of Environmental Policy and Planning, Bangkok, Tailàndia. 353 p.
↑Menon, A.G.K., 1999 Check list - fresh water fishes of India. Rec. Zool. Surv. India, Misc. Publ., Occas. Pap. Núm. 175, 366 p.
↑Nath, P. i S.C. Dey, 1989. Fish and fisheries of North East India. Arunachal Pradesh Vol. 1, 1-143p.
↑Shrestha, J., 1999. Coldwater fish and fisheries in Nepal. FAO Fish. Tech. Pap. 385:13-40.
↑Suwal, R., W.J.M. Verheught i P. Yonzon, 1995. Red data book of the fauna of Nepal. Biodiversity Profiles Project Publication. Núm. 4. With contributions on butterflies by Colin Smith. Department of National Parks and Wildlife Conservation. Katmandú, Nepal.
Anònim, 2001. Base de dades de la col·lecció de peixos del National Museum of Natural History (Smithsonian Institution). Smithsonian Institution - Division of Fishes.
Rainboth, W. J., 1986: Fishes of the Asian cyprinid genus Chagunius. Occasional Papers of the Museum of Zoology University of Michigan. Núm. 712: 1-17.
Riede, K., 2004. Global register of migratory species - from global to regional scales. Final Report of the R&D-Projekt 808 05 081. Federal Agency for Nature Conservation, Bonn, Alemanya. 329 p.
Smith, H. M., 1938: Chagunius, a new genus of Asiatic cyprinoid fishes. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington v. 51: 157-158.