Hello, Adrikshit. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Shilpi Raj".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:36, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

- Please do not add any Indic script, to any of our India related articles, as you did at Buxar, as this contravenes WP:NOINDICSCRIPT - Thank you - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 20:12, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Thekua, you may be blocked from editing.
It was clearly explained, above, that you should not add Indic script to our articles, but have continued to do so, please stop. - Arjayay (talk) 20:19, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Bhojpuri language, you may be blocked from editing. RegentsPark (comment) 22:17, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jeraxmoira was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dances of Bhojpuri Region and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 12:08, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Adrikshit! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 12:08, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Hey, I'm from Mirzapur. Main language of Kajri is Awadhi. It's no way बिहारी. It has some bhojpuri content because of Banaras Aman8188 (talk) 19:31, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Just because you don't speak Bhojpuri doesn't mean the language of the land would be Awadhi. Bhojpuri is spoken by majority in the district, Refers to the census 2011 data and official regional language of Mirzapur. Bhojpuri is spoken in few parts of Bihar and major parts in Uttar Pradesh with few districts of Jharkhand and Chhattisgarh as well. Mirzapur has Western Bhojpuri dialects which sound a bit different than Bihari one. Adrikshit (talk) 06:34, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Bhojpuri is spoken only by 18% population. Mirzapur is divided in 4 divisions. Mirzapur, Lalganj,Marihan and Chunar. 3 of them Speak Awadhi. Only eastern part of Chunar speaks mix of Awadhi and Bhojpuri because they have marrital relationships in neighbouring bhojpuri district. Kajri originated in Kantit which falls in Mirzapur Tehsil which is totally Awadhi Area. I see you guys insert bhojpuri everywhere. Aman8188 (talk) 07:02, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Awadhi is spoken by 0.17% of population. Thats 4k population due to border with Prayagraj. Kajari is not originated from Mirzapur but that place is just famous so in Banaras. For more details about Kajari, read book on folk songs in bhojpuri. You will get Idea about it. Adrikshit (talk) 07:38, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You are on high bro. Stop inserting bhojpuri everywhere. It's people like you are propogating everything as bhojpuri. History of Awadhi is older than bhojpuri. Just because Awadhi people don't care of their language, you guys are making everything bhojpuri. Come in Mirzapur, speak bhojpuri.. people would call you Bihari. We are part of baghelkhand not Purvanchal. We don't share any culture with bhojpuri people. We don't know what is Chhath puja. Banaras is nothing but a cultural centre. Banaras gharana is more related to Awadhi culture than Bhojpuri. Since they speak mixed language, they transform everything in Bhojpuri. Go and listen kajri of chhannulal mishra. He would tell you exact story... Probably you don't know about Braj kajri. Be limited to Bihar. Purvanchal is mix of Awadhi-Bhojpuri traditions. Aman8188 (talk) 07:47, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

State with source and write what you want to prove. Your opinion isn't a proof. Kajari is composed in Bhojpuri and sing in several parts. You don't celebrate anything doesn't mean that doesn't exist. Adrikshit (talk) 07:54, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It's better to show ashleelpuris their aukat. You have controlled everything earlier. Let Awadhi people rise then they would tell what is yours. Everything is propogated by bhojpuris in their own favour Aman8188 (talk) 07:58, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

hey,I am reporting you for persistant subtle vandalism on kajri and other pages. i have warned you many times but you arecontinuously reverting.

== Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion ==

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.

Aman8188 (talk) 18:38, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Hermes Express (talk) 18:40, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A link to the policy that AI generated images cannot be used? An admin, Diannaa, edited the caption indicating it was AI-generated. You also made significant changes to the article not mentioned in your ES. Adakiko (talk) 11:53, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have just reverted the change which was done by the user nothing significant. I didnt added in the summary cause article was changed several times. I have explained in my previous edits.

Here is how you can use AIAI . The image which is added in the articles. Similar to a real picture which might infringe copyright. Adrikshit (talk) 13:06, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Caribbean Hindustani. Thank you. Tarlby ^{(t) (c)} 18:32, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop edit warring. This may lead to a block. Tarlby ^{(t) (c)} 18:35, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

that user already changed the edit after your warning. Take action against him Adrikshit (talk) 05:00, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Bhojpuri language. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 08:12, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Bhojpuri paintings. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Mekomo (talk) 06:44, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Adrikshit. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Dances of Bhojpuri Region, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:07, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Blaada. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Hori (music) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. ßﾚααdα (talk) 10:15, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have already given you enough information regarding Hori as an folk song genre is different from hori songs in Brajbhasha which is mainly revolve around radha krishna. Adrikshit (talk) 23:51, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Don't remove content and citations without giving a valid reason. If you think there are detailed reasons for removal, please discuss on talk:Hori (music) and get wp:consensus before restoring. See wp:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle. Thank you Adakiko (talk) 00:01, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Hori (music), you may be blocked from editing. Adakiko (talk) 00:03, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Hori (music). This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Adakiko (talk) 00:11, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Adrikshit. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bhojpuri paintings, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:07, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Adrikshit. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Bhojpuri paintings".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions here. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 07:25, 10 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Chutney music, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 13:37, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Hermes Express (talk) 19:53, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. Hermes Express (talk) 13:21, 9 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Adrikshit! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Awadhi language several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Awadhi language, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.. Eucalyptusmint (talk) 15:41, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently edited a page related to the region of South Asia (India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal), broadly construed, including but not limited to history, politics, ethnicity, and social groups, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged in, have 500 edits, and have an account age of 30 days in order to make edits related to two subtopics: (1) Indian military history, or (2) social groups, explicitly including caste associations and political parties related to India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

~ L 🌸 (talk) 21:37, 9 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions at articles related to South Asia did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. It seems you are pushing Bhojpuri language in every articles you edited. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.

Ḅ̵̼̝̭͔͆̿́͌̚l̷͖̯͚͕̭̑͑̀͑͘a̵͍̘̥̟̪͗̈́̈́͒͠â̷̮͎̲̪̥̿̐͗͝d̵̰͓̠̘̫͒̎̽͊̉a̷̛̬̜̲̲͙̅͛͝͠ (talk) 06:18, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ▄︻テ░Blaada══━一 (talk) 15:31, 6 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Adrikshit! Your additions to Purvi have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license—to request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

• Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
• Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
• Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's eligibility.
• Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § Licensing.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. MCE89 (talk) 13:06, 2 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Phaguwa, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Passengerpigeon (talk) 20:32, 19 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hoary was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Entire paragraphs are unreferenced.

One of the references reads Society, Bihar Research (1968). The Journal of the Bihar Research Society. Bihar Research Society. Which article(s) in this journal? (What title(s), page numbers, author(s)?)

There's little point in linking a title to a Google Books page that merely provides a "snippet view", or no view at all. But do provide page numbers and ISBNs (or OCLC numbers for books that lack ISBNs).

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bhojpuri Paintings and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hoary (talk) 08:53, 24 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Satuaan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 08:49, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Satuaan, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

asilvering (talk) 03:08, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by MCE89 were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Unsourced statements like It represents a unique expression of the region's folk psyche, showcasing a remarkable blend of emotions, thoughts, colors, and lines are not appropriate for an encyclopedia. A Wikipedia article must summarise what is is contained in reliable, independent secondary sources, ideally supported by inline citations to those sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bhojpuri Paintings and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MCE89 (talk) 09:26, 7 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Snowycats was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Purabi (music) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Snowycats (talk) 01:17, 14 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]