Wiki Article

User talk:Hawkeye7

Nguồn dữ liệu từ Wikipedia, hiển thị bởi DefZone.Net

Archives:

2007 · 2008 · 2009 · 2010 · 2011 · 2012 · 2013 · 2014 · 2015 · 2016 · 2017 · 2018 · 2019 · 2020 · 2021 · 2022 · 2023 · 2024 · 2025
Requests for adminship and bureaucratship update
No current discussions. Recent RfAs, recent RfBs: (successful, unsuccessful)

MILHIST template question

[edit]

Hawkeye, what change needs to be made to WikiProject banner at Talk:USS Romeo so that this shows up in the MILHIST FA categories instead of the MILHIST A-Class categories? It passed ACR in June 2025 and FAC in December 2025. Hog Farm Talk 02:03, 16 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I have corrected this. Not completely happy though. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 06:29, 16 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Edward Neufville Crosse

[edit]

Hi Hawkeye, hope you're well? A while ago you gave some feedback on Edward Neufville Crosse, namely about referencing. I think I have made the required changes now, and would really appreciate a final check on whether it now meets B Class requirements? Thanks! BBWood1908 (talk) 15:44, 16 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Re-assessed B class. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 19:40, 16 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Cheers Hawkeye! BBWood1908 (talk) 11:14, 17 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]
The Downlink The WikiProject Spaceflight Newsletter
2025
1 — 31 December
Volume 3 — Issue 11
Spaceflight Project • Project discussion • Members • Assessment • Open tasks • Popular pages • The Downlink
In the News
  • The International Space Station's eight compartments were fully occupied for the first time on 1 December, with the rebirthing of Cygnus NG-23 to Unity.
  • On 3 December, China's Zhuque-3 made the first non-American attempt at landing a booster. The booster failed to land following a landing-burn anomaly. A second attempt on the 23rd, this time using the new Long March 2A launch vehicle, also failed.
  • On 6 December, contact with NASA's MAVEN Mars orbiter was lost. The last received telemetry was from the 4th, with the fragmented transmission of the 6th suggesting that the craft was rotating in an unintended way, and possibly having changed orbit. As of 16 January 2026, the mission has not yet been officially ended, although reestablishing communications with MAVEN is considered highly improbable.
Featured Content
Article of the month

PROCYON (Proximate Object Close flyby with Optical Navigation) was an asteroid flyby space probe that was launched together with Hayabusa2 on 3 December 2014 13:22:04 (JST). It was developed by University of Tokyo and JAXA. It was a small (70 kg, approx. 60 cm cube), low cost (¥500 million) spacecraft.

It was intended to flyby the asteroid (185851) 2000 DP107 in 2016, but the plan was abandoned due to the malfunction of the ion thruster.

Image of the month
STS-116 spacewalk

STS-116 was the 33rd mission of the Space Shuttle Discovery. Launched in the late evening of 6 December, the main aims of the mission were the installation of one of the International Space Station's Integrated Truss Structure segments, rewiring of the power system, and personnel exchange. Also known as ISS-12A.1, STS-116 was the first mission to include a Swedish astronaut, Christer Fuglesang. It returned to Earth in the evening of 22 December.

This image, of the first of three EVA sessions, was taken on the fourth day of the mission. Flight engineer Robert Curbeam is on the left, opposite mission specialist 3 Christer Fuglesang. The image was taken over New Zealand; the South Island is visible on the left, while the southern portion of the North Island, mostly consisting of the Wairarapa region, is visible in the top-right.

Members

New Members: none

Number of active members: 218. Total number of members: 445.

December Launches
All times stated here are in UTC. See the complete list here.


  1. China Zhuque-3no payload (3 Dec. at 04:00) (success)
  2. South KoreaBrazilIndia HANBIT-NANOvarious (22 Dec. at 12:45) (launch failure)
  3. China Long March 12Amass simulator (23 Dec. at 02:00:00) (success)
  4. IndiaUnited States LVM3 — BlueBird-6 (24 Dec. at 03:25:30) (success)
  5. RussiaIranMontenegroKuwaitBelarus Soyuz-2.1b (1st stage), Fregat-M (2nd stage) — various (28 Dec. at 13:18:05) (success)
Article Statistics
This data reflects values from 31 December 2025.

Monthly Changes

Since November 2025, there are one more mid-importance, 29 more low-importance, two more NA-importance, and 20 more unknown-importance class articles, for a total of 52 more articles. There are also one more FA-class articles, one less GA-class articles, ten more C-class articles, 20 more Start-class articles, eleven more Stub-class articles, and four more lists.

Discuss & propose changes to The Downlink at The Downlink talk page. To unsubscribe from the newsletter remove your name from the Mailing list.
Newsletter contributors: Ships&Space

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:27, 17 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Netball

[edit]

Netball has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 16:01, 17 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2026-04

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 20:27, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Hawkeye I have a problem per se, with another article, and I am trying to find the best place to reach out to the military project group at large

[edit]

Hi Hawkeye. Sorry to bug you but I would like your help.

For the article United States intervention in Syria. Some of the editors tried to remove the entire infobox. I did not create this article, but even I will admit that it is rather long. On the other hand this conflict has an extremely complex history and system of alliances, and I do not think removing an entire infobox especially without deliberation sets a good precedent.

That being said I am not 100% sure how the military project would handle or historically has handled such extreme edits before. I get sometimes infobox issues can be tricky, but if we start removing entire infoboxes, we are going to lose a lot of that on many military conflicts.

I proposed 2 comromises:

  1. We modify the infobox to removed the military leaders.
  2. We modify the infobox to be more simple, however owing to the extreme complexity of this conflict perhaps we add a new article that is solely a summary of belligerents of this conflict, complete with a chart. And only dedicate that page for those purposes.

But again I am looking for information on how similar cases were handled by military project volunteers as a whole to see if I can find other solution or to find out if my compromises are good ideas or not, or maybe perhaps my compromise ideas are not acceptable for reasons I am not aware of or have not thought of.

Where do you suggest I go to find such answers? Can you send me a link or refer me to some editors?

Thank you so much. (: Historyguy1138 (talk) 17:31, 24 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
You deserve this barnstar for all your contributions since 2005, especially those related to the Gaza war. Pachu Kannan (talk) 14:30, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2026-05

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 21:15, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your nomination of Special Engineer Detachment is under review

[edit]

Your good article nomination of the article Special Engineer Detachment is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 05:04, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue 237, January 2026

[edit]
Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:10, 28 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 29 January 2026

[edit]

January–February 2026 NPP drive - Phase 2

[edit]
NPP unreviewed article statistics as of February 02, 2026

Welcome to Phase 2 of the January–February 2026 NPP drive. During Phase 1, we reviewed 16,658 articles and 4,416 redirects, and there is currently a backlog of 16,475 articles and 23,782 redirects in the queue. Fantastic job! Completing 22,502 patrols in the first phase made a significant dent in the backlog. Let's keep our foot on the gas for Phase 2, and I hope we can achieve even more reviews than Phase 1. Best of luck!

You are receiving this message because you added your name to the participants list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:21, 2 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2026-06

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 17:41, 2 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your nomination of Special Engineer Detachment has passed

[edit]

Your good article nomination of the article Special Engineer Detachment has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 15:24, 4 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

GA award Charles Thau

[edit]

A Barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Good Article Barnstar
I wanted to sincerely thank you for your rigorous and helpful review of Charles Thau. Your patience with the offline verification and image provenance was invaluable. This history means a great deal to my family, and I appreciate you helping me get it right. Milwaukee911 (talk) 07:41, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2026-07

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 23:28, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for James I. Hopkins Jr.

[edit]

On 10 February 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article James I. Hopkins Jr., which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that James I. Hopkins Jr., who signed the order to bomb Hiroshima, mysteriously disappeared without a trace? You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, James I. Hopkins Jr.), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

Hook update
Your hook reached 37,318 views (1,554.9 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of February 2026 – nice work!
GalliumBot (talkcontribs) (he/it) 03:27, 11 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:02, 10 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

This Month in GLAM: January 2026

[edit]




Headlines
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

Orphaned non-free image File:James I. Hopkins Jr.gif

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:James I. Hopkins Jr.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:19, 13 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I went through the aforementioned article and made a few revisions, but I cannot do a formal review at the moment due to my ongoing examinations. I will, however, fix any changes if necessary. Good luck with your nomination. MSincccc (talk) 11:40, 14 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Queue 4

[edit]

You just deleted the queue; as the reviewer, I don't think you're supposed to mess around with it. Also, the secondary source says "Van Vleck credits her with key work on the quantum mechanics of magnetism", which was early work. I have no objection to restoring the thesis part, but my information was correct and it's best to notify me. Viriditas (talk) 01:22, 16 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

You're right; I should not have edited it. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 01:27, 16 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
That's okay. I've made the same mistake before. Now, how do you want to word it? Viriditas (talk) 01:28, 16 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
The issue I have is that the hook and the article are now out of step. The wording of the article, hook, and source should all agree with each other. (WP:DYKHOOKCITE) The Conversation source (fn 1) says "Frank’s thesis, partially published in Physical Review in 1932, focused on the element samarium. It showed quantum mechanical corrections were needed to explain the experimental data and contains a plot that appears in Van Vleck’s Nobel lecture (fn 6), labelled 'V.V. & F'." The Nobel Prize speech does not cite Frank's thesis but a 1929 paper, Van Vleck, J. H.; Frank, A. (1 December 1929). "The Effect of Second Order Zeeman Terms on Magnetic Susceptibilities in the Rare Earth and Iron Groups". Physical Review. 34: 1494–1496. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.34.1494.. I know from personal experience that supervisors often publish material from their graduate students under their own name, but at least van Vleck read it. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 03:10, 16 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I’m confused. I added back in the wording you wanted. Are you saying it should be removed again? Viriditas (talk) 05:10, 16 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
No, it now matches the article. The use of "cited" is a bit colloquial here but I think it is okay. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 05:42, 16 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
What would you change it to ("cited") if you had a preference? Viriditas (talk) 21:25, 16 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I am not sure. I am not good at finding better words. Referenced? Included research from? Hawkeye7 (discuss) 22:30, 16 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Savannah River Plant article

[edit]

This sentence in the article appears to contain an error: "The commissioners learned that DuPont was recommending the acquisition of 240,000 acres (97,000 ha) instead of 2,160,000 acres (870,000 ha)." The source: Reed, et al 2002, at page 144 states: "The engineering manpower was needed as the AEC learned that Du Pont was recommending the acquisition of 240,000 acres rather than the 160,000 first projected." The 240,000 acres as the larger number is consistent with the next sentence of the article; "The additional land provided river frontage as a natural boundary, secure access to the water supply, and provide flexibility in the location of pumping stations." Other than that, B class headed up. Donner60 (talk) 01:41, 16 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Typo. Corrected. Thanks for that. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 03:13, 16 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2026-08

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 19:15, 16 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 17 February 2026

[edit]
  • Disinformation report: Epstein's obsessions
    The sex offender's attempts to whitewash Wikipedia run deeper than we first thought.
  • Crossword: Pop quiz
    Sharpen your pencil. How well do you really know Wikipedia?

Help, please

[edit]

I want to be sure you're seeing [28], and I really hope you can help keep this from ending in tears. You of all people know how much respect men such as Uwikis deserve, and I don't want to see him hurt. EEng 13:27, 23 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2026-09

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 19:01, 23 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

This is to let you know that Relief of Douglas MacArthur has been scheduled as today's featured article for 11 April 2026. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/April 2026, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/April 2026. Please keep an eye on that page, as notifications of copy edits to or queries about the draft blurb may be posted there. I also suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from two days before it appears on the Main Page. Thanks, and congratulations on your work! Z1720 (talk) 21:52, 24 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]