DZ
DefZone.Net

Kien thuc cong nghe & giai tri

Wiki Article

Wikipedia:Requests for permissions

Nguồn dữ liệu từ Wikipedia, hiển thị bởi DefZone.Net

Xem trên WikipediaBài ngẫu nhiên khác
"WP:PERM" redirects here. You may be looking for Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission or Help:Permanent link.
This page is under extended confirmed protection, but non-EC users may edit its subpages.

    Requests for permissions
    Shortcuts

    This page enables administrators to handle requests for permissions on the English Wikipedia. Administrators are able to modify account creator, autopatrolled, confirmed, file mover, extended confirmed, mass message sender, new page reviewer, page mover, pending changes reviewer, rollback, and template editor rights, and AutoWikiBrowser access.

    Editors wishing to request a permission flag here should do so following the procedure below. Editors requesting permissions are advised to periodically revisit the requests page, as notifications will not always be given after a decision is made. Editors should not expect their request to be answered right away and should remember to be patient when filing a request. To find out what permissions your account has, go to Special:Preferences, where your permissions are listed in the user profile tab under "Member of groups".

    Requests for permissions are archived regularly; please see Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Archive for an index of past requests.

    Bot report: No errors! Report generated at 06:00, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

    Permissions

    [edit]

    Handled here

    [edit]
    • Account creator (add request · view requests): The account creator flag is granted to users who are active in the request an account process. The flag removes the limit on the maximum number of new accounts that can be created in a 24 hour period. It also allows users to make accounts with names similar to other accounts. The account creator flag is only given to users who participate in the ACC process and may be removed without notice should a user's participation in the account creation process cease.
    • Autopatrolled (add request · view requests): The autopatrolled flag is granted to users who are active in the creation of new articles. This tool is granted so their creations are auto patrolled in Special:NewPages. Unlike other requests, any user may nominate an editor for Autopatrolled, even without that user's consent. A user who wishes to have this flag generally should have created at least 25 articles and must be trusted, experienced, and must have demonstrated they are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, especially WP:BLP and Wikipedia:Notability.
    • AutoWikiBrowser (add request · view requests): AutoWikiBrowser is a semi-automated MediaWiki editor for Microsoft Windows, designed to make tedious repetitive tasks quicker and easier. It is essentially a browser that automatically opens up a new page when the last is saved. When set to do so, it suggests some changes (typically formatting) that are generally meant to be incidental to the main change. Please read the rules of use and registration requirements on the main page before requesting permission. This is not a true user right, but access needs to be granted by administrators just like other permissions. If approved, your name will be added to the CheckPage. Users with under 250 non-automated mainspace edits or 500 total mainspace edits are rarely approved. You will need to give a reason for wanting AWB access.
    • Confirmed (add request · view requests): The confirmed flag may be granted to new users who have not yet hit the threshold for autoconfirmed status. These are users who have not had both 10 edits and 4 days experience. People with this flag can upload files and edit semi-protected pages before hitting the autoconfirmed flag. Users requesting this flag must indicate clearly why they should be exempted from the customary confirmation period.
    • Event coordinator (add request · view requests): The event coordinator user right allows editors to create multiple new accounts, and to temporarily confirm accounts so that they can create new articles.
    • Extended confirmed (add request · view requests): The extended confirmed flag is normally automatically added to accounts after 500 edits and 30 days, but may be added to legitimate alternate accounts of users that already have this access. The flag allows users to edit pages under extended confirmed protection.
    • File mover (add request · view requests): The file mover user right is intended to allow users experienced in working with files to rename them, subject to policy, with the ease that autoconfirmed users already enjoy when renaming Wikipedia articles.
    • Mass message sender (add request · view requests): Mass message sender enables users to send messages to multiple users at once. This flag is given to users who have made requests for delivery in the past, clearly showing an understanding of the guidance for use.
    • New page reviewer (add request · view requests): The new page reviewer user right allows users to mark pages as patrolled and use the page curation toolbar. At administrators' discretion, the right may be accorded on a time limited basis or indefinite.
    • Page mover (add request · view requests): The page mover user right allows users experienced in working with article names to move them, subject to policy, without leaving behind a redirect. They may also move all subpages when moving the parent page(s). General guidelines include making 3,000 edits and 6 months of editing history. At administrators' discretion, the right may be accorded on a time limited basis or indefinite.
    • Pending changes reviewer (add request · view requests): The reviewer flag is granted to users who are experienced enough with Wikipedia editing and its policies for contributing to the process of reviewing articles placed under pending changes.
    • Rollback (add request · view requests): Rollback enables users to remove vandalism much more quickly and efficiently than by undoing it. Users who do not demonstrate an understanding of what constitutes capable vandalism fighting, either because they have no or little history of doing so, or show a poor ability to discern between good and bad faith edits will not be granted this right. Also, it is unlikely that editors with under 200 mainspace edits will have their request granted. For a more detailed explanation of rollback and information about when it is appropriate to use the tool, see Wikipedia:Rollback. For information about the technical details of the feature, see here.
    • Template editor (add request · view requests): The template editor flag allows users to edit protected templates and Lua modules. General guidelines for granting include making at least 1,000 edits overall (with at least 150 to templates or modules), being a registered user for over a year, and having a record of successfully proposing significant edits to several protected templates. Users should demonstrate proficiency with template syntax and an understanding of the need for caution when editing heavily-used templates.
    • Temporary account IP viewer (add request · view requests): Temporary account IP viewers are able to view the IP address information associated with temporary accounts.

    Handled elsewhere

    [edit]

    Several permissions are requested and handled elsewhere:

    Review and removal of permissions

    [edit]

    The requests for permissions process is not used to review or remove user rights:

    The bureaucrat, checkuser, and oversight permissions are removed at meta:Steward requests/Permissions. Stewards will typically not carry out such requests unless they are made on behalf of the Arbitration Committee, by a user who is requesting their own access be removed, or in cases of an emergency.

    Process

    [edit]

    Requestors

    [edit]

    To make a request for a permission, click "add request" next to the appropriate header and fill in the reason for wanting the permission.

    Administrators

    [edit]
    Full instructions at Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Administrator instructions

    Administrators are permitted to grant account creator, autopatrolled, confirmed, event coordinator, file mover, mass message sender, new page reviewer, page mover, pending changes reviewer, rollback and template editor flags to any user who meets the criteria explained above and can be trusted not to abuse the tool(s). Administrators may either grant these permissions permanently or temporarily. For convenience, a bot will automatically comment with relevant data if the user does not meet configurable qualifications. Even if the bot does not comment, administrators should review the user's contributions and logs to ensure the tools will be used appropriately and check for any indication of potential misuse.

    Once an administrator has granted a permission or decided to deny a request, they should add {{done}} or {{not done}} respectively under the request with their comments. If a user already has the requested permission, or is autoconfirmed and requesting confirmed, {{already done}} should be used. N hours after the last comment was made (as specified by the config), the request will be archived automatically: approved requests will be placed here; declined requests will go here. See User:MusikBot/PermClerk#Archiving for more information on archiving functionality.

    Other editors

    [edit]

    Requests for permissions is primarily intended for editors requesting a permission for their own account. Other editors are welcome to comment if they have specific information that is relevant to that request that a patrolling administrator is unlikely to discover for themselves. Otherwise, since only administrators can effectively respond to these requests, general comments or 'clerking' by other users are rarely helpful. Non-administrators cannot "decline" to grant a request, because they're not in a position to accept it.

    A limited exception to this is Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Autopatrolled, where third party nominations are encouraged. Other editors should still avoid offering general remarks on requests and leave the final decision to an administrator.

    Current requests

    [edit]

    Account creator

    [edit]
    Sorry, temporary accounts cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

    Autopatrolled

    [edit]
    Sorry, temporary accounts cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

    User:VirreFriberg

    [edit]

    @VirreFriberg has created 71 articles since 2019, of which none have been deleted. They have 12 GAs and 1 FL. I had the pleasure of reviewing Each and Every Day, which they turned from a redirect into a high-quality, well researched article! I was surprised to see that they aren't already autopatrolled, as their articles are devoid of any issues! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! 11WB (talk) 17:07, 20 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    Hi, @11WB! Somehow (and embarrassingly) I've been unaware of the concept of autopatrolling during my almost 7 years editing on Wiki. Thanks for bringing it to light. Thanks for the compliment, I've found that my articles have increased in quality after The Wikipedia Library granted me access to various repositories and my grasp on the English language improved VirreFriberg (talk) 18:12, 20 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    No worries at all! AP just means article creations skip the new page feed, meaning reviewers such as myself don't need to mark them as reviewed, at which point they would be visible on search engines such as Google. TWL is a great resource! Your articles are very well researched, I specialise in music myself offwiki, so it is always nice to see articles such as those you have authored! Keep it up! 11WB (talk) 23:11, 20 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    Update: I have voluntarily requested my reviewer permissions be revoked since making this request. I considered withdrawing this, however I've decided against doing that. This will likely be the last AP request I make for the foreseeable future. Thanks! 11WB (talk) 02:10, 22 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Umais Bin Sajjad

    [edit]

    I have created over 150 mainspace articles (primarily in the area of Film and TV). While some of my earlier creations were deleted, the majority of my recent articles remain live, and I have refined my sourcing and notability assessment standards over time. I am familiar with WP:N, WP:BLP, WP:V and WP:RS and I ensure that all new articles meet notability and sourcing standards prior to creation. As I continue to create new articles...I believe autopatrolled would help reduce workload for NPP, as my pages generally require minimal follow-up. Umais Bin Sajjad (talk) 12:03, 22 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    AutoWikiBrowser

    [edit]
    Sorry, temporary accounts cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

    User:PolishHamster

    [edit]

    Hi. I'm requesting AutoWikiBrowser to edit, clean up and fix wikipedia fast and efficiently.

    I'm requesting AWB for 3 main reasons, all 3 reasons I find quite hard to do on my own.

    • Typos (scrolling through an article to find typos is quite hard to see)
    • Adding a navbox (For small, low-quality articles)
    • Adding categories fast and efficiently (I Have trouble with HotCat)
    • I have read all sections of WP:AWB and understand that I am responsible for my actions using AutoWikiBrowser.

    Thank you. If I am granted AWB, I will use the tool responsibly.   ~ DatPolishHamster  17:56, 24 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    Automated comment This user has had 1 request for autowikibrowser declined in the past 90 days ([1]). — MusikBot talk 18:00, 24 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]


    Confirmed

    [edit]
    Sorry, temporary accounts cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

    User:Boabab21

    [edit]

    We'd like to update our charity's logo since we re-branded in January. We're logged-in and tried uploading the new file, but it says that our account has not been confirmed yet. We'd like to get our account confirmed so we can update our logo, or for somebody else to upload the file on our behalf. Boabab21 (talk) 15:29, 25 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    Event coordinator

    [edit]
    Sorry, temporary accounts cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

    Extended confirmed

    [edit]
    Sorry, temporary accounts cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

    User:SLSTSL

    [edit]
    am requesting Extended Confirmed permission. I understand that this permission was previously revoked within the past 180 days. Since then, I have focused on making constructive edits, following Wikipedia’s content and conduct policies more carefully, and avoiding the issues that led to the prior removal.

    I am requesting Extended Confirmed so that I can contribute to pages that are under extended-confirmed protection, particularly in areas where I have been editing constructively. I understand the responsibility that comes with this permission and will continue to adhere to consensus, sourcing standards, and dispute resolution processes.

    Thank you for your consideration. My previous removal was related to gaming of the system. Since then, I have avoided disputes, improved sourcing, sought consensus and legitamitley edited.

    (Non-administrator comment) SLSTSL, you will almost certainly need to provide an explanation of why you want XC and other relevant information. A blank request probably won't work. 45dogs (they/them) (talk page) (contributions) 15:33, 20 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    It appears the request was malformed and the bot removed it. 45dogs (they/them) (talk page) (contributions) 15:37, 20 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks for pointing that out. I’ve now resubmitted the request in the proper format with an explanation. SLSTSL (talk) 04:41, 21 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    Thank you for the guidance. I’ve now added an explanation outlining why I’m requesting Extended Confirmed. SLSTSL (talk) 04:43, 21 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    Automated comment This user has had this permission revoked in the past 180 days ([2]). — MusikBot talk 04:40, 21 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    User:LP_PERRORP

    [edit]

    XC for my alt lp0 on fire () 17:17, 23 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

     Done voorts (talk/contributions) 17:40, 23 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    File mover

    [edit]
    Sorry, temporary accounts cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

    User:Agent VII

    [edit]

    I'm requesting the file mover right to help reducing the backlogs at here. I am a file mover at Commons and familiar with most of the policies listed at WP:FMV/W. Thank you. Agent 007 (talk) 18:12, 21 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    Mass message sender

    [edit]
    Sorry, temporary accounts cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.


    New page reviewer

    [edit]
    Sorry, temporary accounts cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

    User:Antoine le Deuxième

    [edit]

    My temporary New Page Reviewer rights are set to expire tomorrow. I would like to request an extension, as I intend to continue contributing to this area. Antoine le Deuxième (talk) 19:06, 11 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Rosguill (expires 00:00, 12 February 2026 (UTC)). — MusikBot talk 19:10, 11 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    Antoine le Deuxième, could you comment on your review of Jacob van Lennep Canal? signed, Rosguill talk 21:06, 13 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    I noticed that the article was translated from the Dutch Wikipedia. I verified the subject’s notability, but I believe the article should be improved with additional sources. Antoine le Deuxième (talk) 15:08, 16 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    Antoine le Deuxième could you provide a little more detail as to how you verified the subject's notability? What steps did you take? signed, Rosguill talk 18:12, 16 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    I just googled it. This canal is mentioned in tourist guides; it is a landmark:
    [3][4][5][6]
    There are also no problems with significant coverage:
    [7] Antoine le Deuxième (talk) 19:56, 16 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    User:I2Overcome

    [edit]

    My continuous (once-renewed) trial since November is set to expire in a few days, and I would like to retain this right permanently if possible. Outside of future NPP and AfC backlog drives, I mostly hope to continue reviewing new geology articles and whatever else stands out to me. I2Overcome talk 00:33, 19 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Sohom Datta (expires 00:00, 21 February 2026 (UTC)). — MusikBot talk 00:40, 19 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Nighfidelity

    [edit]

    As an AFC reviewer and TWL user, I'd like to help address the NPP backlog. Nighfidelity (talk) 15:50, 19 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Loytra

    [edit]

    Back in September I was granted a one-month page reviewer trial. Though it's been a few months, I'd like to reapply.

    The reasons and caveats of my application are essentially the same as last time, so I don't really have much else to add, unfortunately. Loytra✨ 11:47, 20 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Hurricane Wind and Fire

    [edit]

    I have been reviewing drafts for AfC since early November (see my AfC log) and I normally leave comments that explain why I declined a draft, if that was the outcome. Over the past few days I have been using the MoveToDraft script and I have draftified a few articles (see my my draftify log). I am always civil to other users and I am opening to answering the questions of others. 🌀Hurricane Wind and Fire (talk) (contribs)🔥 15:43, 21 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Snowmanonahoe

    [edit]

    I'd like to try something new, and I think I should be qualified for this. My AFD !votes were all a long time ago, but I like to think that they do a particularly good job at demonstrating my familiarity with the deletion policy.[a] Note also that in terms of article creation, I technically have none, but I'd argue Instrumental play basically is one – I blew up almost everything that was originally there (including the previous title), and the article was even unreviewed by an NPPer (and then reviewed by another one). Snowmanonahoe (talk · contribs · typos) 01:27, 22 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    Notes

    1. ^ except that comment on NAUTHOR on William Henderson Kelly, that was kind of stupid.

    User:Metallurgist

    [edit]

    I previously received a temporary grant, and have reviewed a few articles, and the bot reminded me it is expiring soon. I have only reviewed a few articles and hoped to do more by now, but have not had the chance. I do regularly review and verify citations of already reviewed articles. Should I work on reviewing more before extending the right or am I at a sufficient point for extension? Thanks. ← Metallurgist (talk) 06:02, 23 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Sohom Datta (expires 00:00, 1 March 2026 (UTC)). — MusikBot talk 06:10, 23 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Dinitrify

    [edit]

    There are so many pages that are not reviewed, I am determined and willing to review many pages as much as I can. Dinitrify (talk) 08:07, 23 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    Automated comment This user has had 2 requests for new page reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([8][9]). — MusikBot talk 08:10, 23 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Nyxion303

    [edit]

    My NPR rights are due to expire within the next week ish, I'd like for it to be extended further to continue helping out. Many thanks! :) Nyxion303💬 Talk 19:44, 23 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Sohom Datta (expires 00:00, 2 March 2026 (UTC)). — MusikBot talk 19:50, 23 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Lflin16

    [edit]

    I have been editing for a while now and would like to use my time to assist with the NPP backlog. I would love to try editing and helping out in a different area from what I have been mostly doing, and page review seems interesting. Thanks! Lflin16 - :) (talk) 02:40, 24 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    Automated comment This user has 266 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot talk 02:50, 24 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Phlogiston Enthusiast

    [edit]

    Hello. I'm Phlogiston Enthusiast. I have ~960 edits total, and more than 500 main space edits. I have created many pages, and am familiar with the policy on page creation, as well as translated a page into English, so I would be familiar with this too. I'm looking for something new to try, and I'd like to try this. I have more than 90 Days of experience as well. I have experience patrolling recent changes. (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 18:48, 24 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    Automated comment This user has had an account for 75 days. — MusikBot talk 18:50, 24 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    Oh. I thought it was longer! Nevermind then. (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 18:53, 24 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Widgetkid

    [edit]

    Rosguill, you had granted me trial permission, so I'm now reapplying. I'm curious if you or HJ Mitchell have any feedback on my efforts so far. Thanks! WidgetKid converse 20:16, 24 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Rosguill (expires 00:00, 3 March 2026 (UTC)) and has had 1 request for new page reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([10]). — MusikBot talk 20:20, 24 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    User:MSK

    [edit]

    NPP expiring soon. I'm not exactly an active NPP reviewer, however I still do believe I am familiar enough with the notability policies (90% because of the AfC backlog drive) to still have this perm. monkeysmashingkeyboards (talk) 20:27, 24 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Sennecaster (expires 00:00, 28 February 2026 (UTC)). — MusikBot talk 20:30, 24 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Delcoan

    [edit]

    Hello! I have noticed that the backlog is pretty big and would love to help out with it. I have over one thousand edits (718 in the main space), and I have written 33 articles. I have participated in an Afd discussion on Ermold v. Davis, and I have two articles that I have written and had promoted to GA status. Thank you! Delcoan (talk) 01:04, 25 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Orange sticker

    [edit]

    Have been finding large numbers of new-ish articles that I have either nominated for deletion or marked with notability templates, would like to start being proactive rather than reactive. Have had this permission before but didn't use it very much as I found it a bit overwhelming. Would like the opportunity to try again and help out with the backlog. Orange sticker (talk) 09:23, 25 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]


    Page mover

    [edit]
    Sorry, temporary accounts cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

    User:Vestrian24Bio

    [edit]

    Hi! I was granted temporary page mover last December, which is to expire in 2 weeks; posting to either extend it or make it permanent; Thanks! Vestrian24Bio 13:27, 20 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    Automated comment This user was granted temporary page mover rights by Toadspike (expires 00:00, 6 March 2026 (UTC)). — MusikBot talk 13:30, 20 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    I was pretty concerned by Wikipedia:Move review/Log/2026 January#Czech Republic men's national ice hockey team, which was unanimously overturned and seemed to show issues with both communication and evaluating consensus. On a quick skim I also noticed Talk:Berri–UQAM station#Requested move 15 January 2026, User talk:Vestrian24Bio/Archives/January 2026#Talk:DLC (disambiguation)#Requested move 22 December 2025, and User talk:Vestrian24Bio/Archives/January 2026#Your close at Mohammed al-Haddad, although all of those did at least get resolved without having to go to MRV. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:42, 24 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    User:WildComet

    [edit]

    Hello, I was previously granted this permission for a three-month trial period at the end of November last year and would like to have this added as a permanent permission. I have supported uncontroversial requested moves, and I have used it when cleaning up articles related to Canadian politics, particularly when ministerial titles change following cabinet shuffles. —WildComet talk 07:55, 21 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    Automated comment This user was granted temporary page mover rights by Toadspike (expires 00:00, 27 February 2026 (UTC)). — MusikBot talk 08:00, 21 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]


    Pending changes reviewer

    [edit]
    Sorry, temporary accounts cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

    User:Phlogiston Enthusiast

    [edit]

    Hello. I'm Phlogiston Enthusiast. I have ~960 edits total, and more than 500 main space edits. I have created many pages, and am familiar with the policy on page creation, as well as translated a page into English, so I would be familiar with this too. I'm looking for something new to try, and I'd like to try this. I have experience patrolling recent changes, which seems as if it would translate into this well. I'm experienced content policy wise as well, and am studying law in fact. (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 18:59, 24 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]


    Rollback

    [edit]
    Sorry, temporary accounts cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

    User:Phlogiston Enthusiast

    [edit]

    This isn't actually a request, but I think I might have accidentally been given rollback. When I go to a user's contribs, I have a functioning rollback option. pHLOGISTON eNTHUSIAST (tALK pAGE) 18:45, 20 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([11]). — MusikBot talk 18:50, 20 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    (Non-administrator comment) @Phlogiston Enthusiast Did you enable Twinkle or install another script, like RedWarn? See File:Rollback and Twinkle rollback.png - the [rollback: 2 edits] is how rollback looks. Your account doesn't have rollback. HurricaneZetaC 19:51, 20 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    Yeah, judging from Special:Diff/1339474798, you're looking at the Twinkle rollback feature, which is basically just as good as standard rollback but available to everyone who's autoconfirmed. Marking  Not done for the bot since you're not making a request. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 22:26, 21 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    Okay haha so sorry!! It seems like I'm just dumb. Haha. pHLOGISTON eNTHUSIAST (tALK pAGE) 22:00, 23 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    User:TrueMoriarty

    [edit]

    Hi. I meet all the requirements for rollback rights. I made over 5,000 edits and I always try to notify users when reverting their edits (except when they are IPs). I also have a firm knowledge of rollback policies. I have reviewed pending changes for over a year and I won multiple barnstar for that (verify). In fact, I currently rank pretty high on the leaderboard (verify). The main reason for requesting this right is to try out new tools to combat vandalism and making Wikipedia a better place.

    My application was denied once in the past due to a mistake of mine, and I was advised to reapply in a month or so.

    Thank you! TrueMoriarty Talk | Contribs 15:53, 21 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([12]). — MusikBot talk 16:00, 21 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Speedrunz

    [edit]

    I would like this right to help me more effectively and efficiently revert vandalism, as tools like Antivandal and WikiShield require it. I have been patrolling recent changes for around 3 months, and have over 1000 edits. Speedrunz (talk) 17:54, 22 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([13]). — MusikBot talk 18:00, 22 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Phlogiston Enthusiast

    [edit]

    Hello! I am Phlogiston Enthusiast. I would like a moment of your time to request rollback rights. I believe that I could use rollback permissions to assist in anti-vandalism in the recent changes tab. There are multiple reasons for this. For one, it would streamline reverts on articles that need them, and be a useful tool against vandalism. This is because if a user is making edits of a vandalistic nature, they are likely to have made multiple. Rollback would assist with these issues and prevent long and drawn-out revert wars by vandals. Second, I believe that I meet the qualifications for the role. I possess experience patrolling the recent changes section, and have reverted many vandalous edits. If need be, I can attempt to provide a comprehensive list of the articles on which I have combatted vandalism. Finally, I understand that it looks bad to have had two arguments over vandalism-related subjects in the past. However, I would argue that this is almost the opposite, as having a clean record with no mistakes would mean that I had no mistakes to learn from, and as well I have apologized to all parties involved in both. In summary, I believe that I should possess rollback rights as to better combat vandalism, and if need be there can be elaboration. If not, I completely understand.

    Ammending: this was written roughly a month ago. I was told that I would need one month's experience more before I should re-apply. I have since aqquired more than this. I have been the cause for scores of blocks and have better since de-vandalized the Wiki. Following my embarrasing mishap recently reguarding confusion over the tool, I have better researched it and now believe I would be more fit to utilize this. (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 20:22, 24 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([14]). — MusikBot talk 20:30, 24 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    Of note, possibly: Following my removal of every single known instance of a specific syntax error, I have gone up to 1030 edits. (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 15:17, 25 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    Template editor

    [edit]
    Sorry, temporary accounts cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

    Temporary account IP viewer

    [edit]
    Sorry, temporary accounts cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.