User talk:CeeGee

My talk page archives:

January music

300 years ago, a Bach cantata was born: happy new year! -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:10, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Danke vielmals. Wünsche Ihnen auch alles Beste für das Neue Jahr. CeeGee 05:23, 2 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Danke! - inviting you to check out "my" story (fun listen today, full of surprises), music (and memory), and places (pictured by me: the latest uploads) any day! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:26, 10 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

20 January is the 100th birthday of David Tudor (see my story) and the 300th birthday of Bach's cantata Meine Seufzer, meine Tränen, BWV 13, if we go by date instead of occasion as he would have thought, so see my story for last Sunday, and celebrate ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:14, 20 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:OdunpazarıSK Logo.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:OdunpazarıSK Logo.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — Ирука¹³ 09:56, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Done CeeGee 06:29, 4 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:OrtahisarBldSK Logo.png

Thank you for uploading File:OrtahisarBldSK Logo.png. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — Ирука¹³ 09:56, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Done CeeGee 06:24, 4 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:AnkaraYurdumSK Logo.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:AnkaraYurdumSK Logo.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — Ирука¹³ 09:56, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Done CeeGee 06:24, 4 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Please do the same with all the files you've uploaded. You can also now remove the deletion tag. — Ирука¹³ 06:33, 4 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Baktygul Toktobolotova

The article Baktygul Toktobolotova has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails GNG

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 19:28, 4 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Organizations based in Kutahya

A tag has been placed on Category:Organizations based in Kutahya indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:17, 12 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Economy of Kütahya

A tag has been placed on Category:Economy of Kütahya indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:19, 12 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Elif Gülşen

The article Elif Gülşen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability, only independent source is a passing mention, one in a list of 26 names.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time. Fram (talk) 12:04, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Elif Gülşen for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Elif Gülşen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elif Gülşen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Fram (talk) 11:25, 20 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]