You're reached Zsinj's userpage. If you'd like to leave me a message, you're more than welcome to.
Current Focus
[edit]
| ||
| ||
|
- Improve Brevard County, Florida to
B-ClassGA-Class- Work through the cheat sheet
- Inspiration: Warren County, Indiana, Robeson County, North Carolina, GA Places
- A Florida-related article to Good Article
- Maybe 1935 Labor Day hurricane
- Category:CS1 errors
- Updating article assessments within the WikiProjects I associate with
- Tending to the admin backlogs below
Administrative backlog
[edit]Reports
[edit]- ~2026-16138 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1102 five times in the last 5 minutes (Rapid disruption, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 18:24, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
False positive. Edits are not vandalism. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 19:52, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
- ~2026-16581 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1361 (LTA 1361, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 18:50, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
- False positive. Edits are not vandalism. Not great, but not vandalism. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 19:51, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
- ~2026-16655 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 614 five times in the last 5 minutes (Memes and vandalism trends (moomer slang + zoomer slang), details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 19:29, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
User-reported
[edit]- Jwh41 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) article Wu Chun Changing name of BLP without source repeatedly after being reverted 3 times so edit warring etc. In conclusion adding without source, edit warring and BLP violations.Theknoledgeableperson (SHOUT HERE) 19:47, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
This noticeboard is for obvious vandals and spammers only. Consider taking this report to Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 20:06, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
- Ghfvkbg (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – LTA. – LuniZunie(talk) 20:08, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
- It would be better to report them once they have some edits, as otherwise they can, theoretically, be anyone with a random bunch of letters for a username... ~Lofty abyss 20:13, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
- @Lofty abyss Sorry, very true. Will report once they make an edit.
Going to remove this report for now.– LuniZunie(talk) 20:14, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
- @Lofty abyss Sorry, very true. Will report once they make an edit.
- @LuniZunie: Please provide more information on these LTA reports. Which LTA and what is the evidence? Daniel Quinlan (talk) 20:13, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
- @Daniel Quinlan Yummie, based on two recent users: User:Yjgjfbxg and User:Yjhifndgf. Lofty is correct though in that I should be waiting. – LuniZunie(talk) 20:15, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Insufficient recent activity to warrant a block. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 20:43, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
- It would be better to report them once they have some edits, as otherwise they can, theoretically, be anyone with a random bunch of letters for a username... ~Lofty abyss 20:13, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
- Steveclarke2022 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – account is being used only for promotional purposes. adequate warning or not, the account shows evidence of sleeper account that is logged in sporadically to carryout specific spam payload and only for that purpose. See edit history. This is a clear cut case of WP:NOTHERE. Graywalls (talk) 20:25, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
- They haven't edited in the last 6 months. PhilKnight (talk) 20:31, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
- I know, but the purpose of restrictions is preventive, not punitive. The account was created spammed in May 2022, came back to spam again in July 2023, took a break and came back only to spam again in July 2025. So I feel this is a good indication of where it's going. It's a spam only account from one of the spam farms. They've not made a single non-spam edit. Graywalls (talk) 20:38, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
- They haven't edited in the last 6 months. PhilKnight (talk) 20:31, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
No vandalism since final warning. Re-report if this user resumes vandalising. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 20:42, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
- ViKaZo (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – On Rajasthan Educational Service (Collegiate Branch): Creation of articles with possible LLM. He used to move the draft to mainspace when AFC declines. And if someone draftify the article due to its problems, he is moving it back to mainspace without significant improvement and. Rajasthan Educational Service (Collegiate Branch) , Rajasthan Educational Service. Editor didn’t agree that he uses AI. AlphaCore talk 20:32, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
- This noticeboard is for obvious vandals and spammers only. Consider taking this report to Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 20:42, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
- I handled this report before seeing Daniel's decline. I have partially blocked them from moving pages. I have moved a couple of their articles to draft space. PhilKnight (talk) 20:50, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
- @PhilKnight and AlphaCore: It might still be worth reporting this to ANI, but it's probably best to wait and see if they continue. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:05, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Partially blocked. Partially blocked by PhilKnight. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:06, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
- I handled this report before seeing Daniel's decline. I have partially blocked them from moving pages. I have moved a couple of their articles to draft space. PhilKnight (talk) 20:50, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
- ~2026-17002 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Keeps vandalizing by adding unsourced additions to the page Candy Raymond. Been Told several times but he doesn't stop. DrKilleMoff (talk) 20:48, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
- User has been incorrectly or insufficiently warned. Re-report if the user resumes vandalising after being warned sufficiently. This looks like a different person than the previous edits.
Page protected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 20:55, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
| Candidates for speedy deletion | Entries |
|---|---|
| Attack pages | 0 |
| Copyright violations | 1 |
| Hoaxes | 0 |
| Vandalism | 0 |
| User requested | 1 |
| Empty articles | 0 |
| Nonsense pages | 0 |
| Spam pages | 0 |
| LLM pages | 0 |
| Importance or significance not asserted | 0 |
| Possibly contested candidates | 11 |
| Other candidates | 18 |
| Wikipedia files with unknown source – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files missing permission – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Disputed non-free Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Orphaned non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Replaceable non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – 9 items
Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 22 items
Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old needing human review – No backlog currently
Requested RD1 redactions – 3 items
| Proposed deletion – No backlog currently |
|---|
- SONICXMARIO2028WINTERGAMES (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Salomibibicha (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
User-reported
[edit]- Diddy100 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a misleading username. – LuniZunie(talk) 01:25, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Wait until the user edits. LuniZunie, the term has multiple meanings, as can be seen from Do Wah Diddy Diddy . Only by seeing actual edits can we determine whether anything is misleading. Cullen328 (talk) 07:57, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
- AllCoolEntertainment (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Peterxy（talk） 14:52, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
- Wait until the user edits. Then we'll see if they're promoting anything, and whether that anything is related to the username. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:36, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Current requests for increase in protection level
[edit]Reason: Add semi-protection please (blocks edits from IPs/new accounts). At least 5 IP vandalism edits in the recent past. Thanks. TudorTulok (talk) 16:29, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Yaris678 (talk) 22:41, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – TAs repeatedly adding "framing device" text to plot summary despite no consensus at Talk page favoring inclusion. DonIago (talk) 16:36, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
- Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:36, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Indefinite protection seems necessary as there seems to be a user utilizing different accounts top persistently insert content without proper sources. See also the talk page, where there have been requests for the content to be added back without any rationale or sources. BlockArranger (talk) 20:48, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 23:04, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:12, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Reason: This page requires protection due to repeated and ongoing vandalism, as well as the systematic addition of inaccurate and misleading information specifically concerning Kurdish content. Despite prior reversions, disruptive edits continue to compromise the integrity and reliability of the article, posing a risk to readers seeking accurate information. Temporary or semi-protection is necessary to prevent further damage while allowing established, experienced editors to maintain and verify content ~2026-19782 (talk) 22:11, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
- Asayish (Democratic Autonomous Administration of North and East Syria) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Reason: This page requires protection due to repeated vandalism and the addition of misleading or unverified information related to the Asayish and the Democratic Autonomous Administration of North and East Syria. The topic is highly sensitive and politically charged, leading to frequent disputes, biased edits, and attempts to insert propaganda or inaccurate claims. Protection is necessary to maintain the accuracy, neutrality, and reliability of the article while allowing experienced editors to oversee content. ~2026-19782 (talk) 22:12, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Reason: Repeated vandalism and insertion of misleading/unverified content on a politically sensitive topic (CTG Kurdistan). Persistent disruption threatens article integrity; protection needed to allow stable editing by experienced contributors. ~2026-19782 (talk) 22:13, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – LTA disruption returns. SuperPianoMan9167 (talk) 22:34, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
- Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Logged as enforcement for WP:CT/BLP. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:35, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Reason: A lot of vandalism hasn’t been reverted ~2026-20381 (talk) 22:39, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CoconutOctopus talk 22:55, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
- Babrak Karmal (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Afghan Civil War (1989–1992) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Battle of Kabul (1992–1996) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent sockpuppetry by Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Alijanhz. HistoryofIran (talk) 23:45, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Almost every recent revision has been reverted. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 00:02, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Yue🌙 (talk) 01:19, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Reason: Vandalism ~2026-22039 (talk) 00:13, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Yue🌙 (talk) 01:21, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Frequent vandalism from 8+ seemingly unrelated TAs over the past day. ScalarFactor (talk) 00:43, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:GS/KURD. Kajmer05 (talk) 01:01, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
[edit]Before posting a request for unprotection, please discuss it with the protecting administrator first. You can create a request below only if you receive no response from them.
To find out which administrator protected the page, go to the page's edit history and click on the "View logs for this page" link (located underneath the page's title). The protecting administrator is listed in the protection log entry, next to the words "protected", "changed protection level", or "configured pending changes". If there are a large number of log entries on the page, use the drop-down menu near the top of the page and select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" to filter the logs accordingly.
DO NOT request a reduction in protection if...
- ...you are being prevented from editing the page. A desire to change content is not a valid reason for unprotection. Instead:
- If you can edit the article's talk page, use the WP:Edit Request Wizard to propose a change on the article's talk page. Include an explanation of the exact content that you want to change, and what the content will be afterward.
- If the article's talk page is protected, you may propose a change at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Edit.
- ...your reasoning for reducing protection is that the article has not been vandalized. That simply means the protection is working as intended.
- ...your reasoning for reducing protection is basically "a long time has passed" without supporting details.
- ...you haven't contacted the protecting administrator.
You may request a protection reduction below if...
- ...you want to change the protection level of a template or module from full protection to template protection. You may add the request to this page without having to discuss it with the protecting administrator first.
- ...you need to remove creation protection from a location where no page exists (redlinked pages) after a draft version of the intended article is prepared beforehand and ready to be published.
- ...you are proposing a trial reduction in protection for a page that has been protected for several years, provided the proposal is supported by evidence such as talk page activity, page views, page traffic, number of watchers, frequency of edit requests, and prior history of vandalism.
- ...the protecting administrator is inactive or has not responded to you in several days.
If you cannot locate your request, make sure to check the request archives to see if it's been moved there. Only requests that have been recently answered will still be listed here.
Unprotection: No need for full protection, I wanna add {{R from unnecessary disambiguation}}. Thepharoah17 (talk) 01:25, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
[edit]Please add an edit request to the talk page of the protected page before adding an edit request here
Requests for specific edits should be made on the talk page of the protected article. You can create an edit request below only if the talk page is also protected, preventing you from adding a request there.
- You may add the appropriate template (
{{Edit protected}},{{Edit template-protected}},{{Edit extended-protected}}, or{{Edit semi-protected}}) to the article's talk page if you would like to request an edit be made. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - For edit requests being made due to the editor having a conflict of interest with the article subject (see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}template should be used instead of the others listed above. - Requests to move pages that are currently move-protected should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not on this page.
- This page is not for holding discussions regarding content. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit that you wish to be performed.
Otherwise, this is the correct place to use in order to add an edit request if you are unable to add one to the article's talk page. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to properly add a request.
Change the reported number of killed in the Gaza Strip from 70,668 to 70,654. The source cited for the existing 70,668 number actually says 70,654. Change the reported number of wounded in the Gaza Strip from 171,152+ to 171,095. The source cited for the existing 171,152+ number actually says 171,095. XXRobloxGod52961XX (talk) 21:38, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
You stated that the Gaza genocide was "The Gaza genocide is the ongoing, intentional, and systematic destruction of the Palestinian people in the Gaza Strip carried out by Israel during the Gaza war." This shows bias towards the Palestinians and does not have a neutral point of view. This should be changed so the article states it as a debated issue that was not fully resolved. WikiWanderer12345678910 (talk) 23:34, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Handled requests
[edit]A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
| 3 protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 16:24, 1 January 2026 (UTC) |
| 2 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 00:59, 2 January 2026 (UTC) |
No RfXs since 17:28, 3 November 2025 (UTC).—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online |