in corporate all three meal words into a single word called "(Breakfludin)". Meaning in short breakfast,lunch & dinner. Meaning when ever your day begins at any given time you can eat your breakfast lunch or dinner. Expressing fasting and irregular eating schedules.

Is Breakfast a Standard Meal?

[edit]

Breakfast is a familiar part of our daily routine that we assume it's something people have always enjoyed. But the truth is there's nothing standard in eating breakfast, The meal breakfast is only necessary for those who work early.

Breakfast was also viewed as gluttony back in the 13th centuries. Thomas Aquinas thought it's a sin to eat to early in the day, and eating before morning mass was frowned upon, for breakfast literally means breaking a fast. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:4451:24F:2000:E0E9:9226:4D4:54AB (talk) 01:02, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I suppose it depends on what you mean by early in the day. Canonical hours include prayers that begin very early and, although I can't find a good source, ChatGPT says:
"In the Middle Ages, Mass was typically celebrated in the morning, often around sunrise or shortly thereafter. The exact timing could vary depending on the local customs and the availability of natural light. It was common for Mass to be held early in the day to allow people to attend before going about their daily tasks."
If this is true, people in the summer could be eating after Mass at six or seven in the morning.
Eating before taking the sacrament seems to be mainly for religious reasons (not to contaminate the host with other foods) than gluttony - https://taylormarshall.com/2006/07/three-reasons-for-eucharistic-fast.html 217.105.140.53 (talk) 18:49, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Don't quote chatGPT 92.22.207.22 (talk) 18:42, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Bumboclat 67.188.219.129 (talk) 04:11, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 16 August 2018 and 4 December 2018. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Alexiscrumby.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 16:13, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Health Benefits Section

[edit]

This short section of the article seemes to be biased towards Monica Reinagel's ideas. The Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics would be a more reliable source, than the website of one particular nutritionist. If alternative viewpoints on breakfast are to be included, this should be in a separate paragraph.

I have edited the section in question, but only as a quick-fix. Someone more experienced should take a look! Also: metabolic benefits and childhood cognitive development are, while related, not the same thing. Adults would obviously not have the same neuro-developmental benefits, as their brains have finished growing. While I'm not versed in Reinagals' writings, I would question if that sentence accurate summarizes her opinion on the matter — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.36.216.27 (talk) 00:13, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Continental breakfast

[edit]

Although this is the traditional breakfast of mainland Europe,

This is incorrect, even if it is partially undone at the end of the section, when it says that there is no unified breakfast culture on "Continental Europe". It may contain elements from many traditional breakfast cultures on "the continent", but it is very much a English term, referring to a English breakfast that is different from the traditional English one. Gerald Jarosch (talk) 20:52, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

In the States, we see it referring to a simple, cheap meal consisting of coffee, juice and some sort of pastry or bread. It's a free offering with a room at some hotels.
First Google hit:
http://www.todayifoundout.com/index.php/2014/06/continental-breakfasts-called/
Kortoso (talk) 20:00, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Middle East

[edit]

I came to this page hoping it would help me straighten out what a common breakfast in The Middle East would consist of. Turkey is represented, which helps some, but the greater Mid-East and North Africa are unrepresented. Can anyone help fill this section in? Jmgariepy (talk) 08:59, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Unreferenced sections removed

[edit]

Again, this article has become bloated with unreferenced content, so I have removed all of it (since a large percentage has been unsourced for over two years). Please only add sourced material to this article. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 09:35, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well done. Logical Cowboy (talk) 16:05, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Added back in Oceania section. Hopefully there are enough citations to satisfy everybody. Also have lived in several cities in both countries most of my life.60.234.229.163 (talk) 22:22, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Some of these unreferenced sections should be added back using the {{Section OR}} template. I added this template to the under-referenced and unreferenced sections remaining on this page. Unreferenced material violates Wikipedia's No Original Research policy. - ʈucoxn\talk 22:08, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Recent Edits

[edit]

However is holding this page's content hostage-- please bring it back. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.130.248.176 (talk) 03:05, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

While I appreciate your strict adherence to sourcing dogma, this article has been shorn of 90% of its former usefulness.

It is also strange that most foreign sections were removed yet the sections concerning North America remain, even when most of those sections are completely unreferenced as well.

Well done. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.6.31.138 (talk) 08:59, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Every section remaining has at least one reference. If you want to add more, feel free to do so, but only if they are referenced. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 09:56, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
What is useful about unreliable information? Logical Cowboy (talk) 03:11, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly how reliable does a page on breakfast options need to be? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.129.102.115 (talk) 23:19, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The single reference in the "Traditional" subsection under "United States and Canada" is a Salmon Croquettes Recipe. The website doesn't seem RS either. I've removed this subsection. El0i (talk) 03:44, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Worrisome

[edit]

I was a frequent visitor to the former "Breakfast" page. It was incredibly interesting and useful. Now, almost none of it is here anymore. What happened!!???? It is an extreme disservice. I don't even know how to post comments, I am just trying my best to get in contact with someone. Really horrible choice, extremely disappointing to see 2-3 countries up there, when there used to be good info on tens of countries. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.124.81.149 (talkcontribs) 06:07, 5 February 2012‎ (UTC)[reply]

The problem with most of the entries was that they were unsourced. Anything that can be sourced can be added back, but unsourced information will not be allowed here as it gets too out of control to easily handle when we have no idea where people are pulling their "facts" from. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 06:35, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I see that. However, I'm going to throw my hat in the ring with the others and say this was excessive. Much of the info and photos seemed to be user-contributed, rather than from official sources. As others have said, how official does a page about cultural breakfast food have to be? People can serve as references in and of themselves. Though, why not give a 30-45 day waiting period to find sources for the existing information, rather than deleting everything and building it back from scratch? The bottom line is, the information here is deficient, and the page is much less informative than it was before.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.174.109.60 (talk) 22:37, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Please refer to WP:VERIFIABILITY and WP:RELIABLESOURCES. The editors can not be the sources of the articles. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 08:31, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Could you please be more specific about the parts which you found were useful, which appear to have gone now? This page has been edited many times since December 11 2011, so it would be helpful if you could be a little more specific and clarify WHICH of the article you thought was useful which now appears to have gone. ACEOREVIVED (talk) 16:44, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As one example, "continental breakfast" redirects here, and there is no longer a single mention of "continental" on this page, despite "continental breakfast" being linked to from full breakfast.


If that is so I would have to agree with you that significant content has been lost. I can back to this discussion when I have perused the current article more thoroughly. ACEOREVIVED (talk) 16:12, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I have now added a little on the continental breakfast, but can some please help - that should have gone under the sub-heading "Europe" but I accidentally put in two many sub-headings. ACEOREVIVED (talk) 09:43, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. Better refs needed, though; see WP:RS (and WP:CITE for the correct way to add them). Yunshui  10:17, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]


What has happened here violates the basic idea of wikipedia, being a collection of knowledge where everybody can contribute. Whereas I have no doubt that information that can be backed up with reliable sources should be used above anything else, I strongly think that unsupported information is far better than no information, as far as it does not concern living people. Stubbornly sticking to citing guidelines for a topic like breakfast is certainly the wrong way to go with wikipedia articles, as can be easily seen by this example (compare an early December 2011 version of it to the current one - it practically became a stub which is directly the opposite of the initial idea of wikipedia which I understand is COLLECTING information (to be improved by anyone), not removing it). I suggest a more balanced approach in applying citing guidelines, particularly removing parts of the article, taking into account how controversial a topic is. In this case for instance, I would not force anyone to adhere to citing guidelines as breakfast is not controversial, but encourage modifications if someone went to a country and has experienced breakfast habits different from what was told by the article AND use citation to make information more solid. I will raise these concerns with the wikipedia team, as well, as I find this a dangerous development. People have spent their freetime and created a great article putting in much effort, just to observe how some months later a bureaucrat deletes most of it, leaving a really uninformative article that used to be almost completed. How motivating will that be to its authors to contribute more to wikipedia? Whereas wikipedia has grown big, I think having motivated writers is still far more essential than sticking to any citing rules. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.173.163.211 (talk) 10:52, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Some of these unreferenced sections should be added back using the {{Section OR}} template. I added this template to the under-referenced and unreferenced sections remaining on this page. Unreferenced material violates Wikipedia's No Original Research policy. - ʈucoxn\talk 22:08, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]




Do you really think all this should be deleted? I am sitting in a library and trying to find references. Wikipedia being a collection of knowledge where everybody can contribute, as someboby said here, it is sad that all this work should vanish.

And it is not such a big difference from what this book: Breakfast Around the World IBSN 0941367460 is saying!

Hafspajen (talk) 15:53, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ Korean breakfast
  2. ^ "Wandering Chopsticks: Banh Mi Hot Ga Op La (Vietnamese French Bread with Sunnyside-Up Eggs)". Wanderingchopsticks.blogspot.com. 2008-02-03. Retrieved 2010-09-07.

Picture Overlap Question

[edit]

Hi, I'm new to Wikipedia language in the edit window. Could anyone please tell me what I would need to do so that the "Toast with vegemite" picture in this article on breakfast doesn't overlap the text in the gallery section right above it? Also, did I post this message in the correct place?

Thanks! 24.25.219.210 (talk) 22:21, 4 April 2012 (UTC)O.C.[reply]

I took care of it. It just needed to be moved to the right. 70.90.87.73 (talk) 13:24, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Query about the Mexican breakfast

[edit]

Never having been to Mexico, I do not not know what Mexican breakfast is like. However, it did seem to rather a contradiction to say that breakfast is the lightest meal of the day, and then to add "Therefore, three courses are common place". ACEOREVIVED (talk) 22:13, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not Canada and the United States? Lumped together is slightly annoying, but why USA first? Is this due to population? Canada is alphabetically first and first mentioned in the section. Plus, Canada has better bacon, and we don't have grits -- horrible, horrible grits. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 18:02, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I had an aunt and uncle move to Vancouver 10 years ago, and they love it. I used to watch a lot of Canadian TV as a kid in the 80's and was always fascinated by that country to our north. It annoys me that we are lumped together, in general, but especially here. It would be interesting to see how a typical Canadian brekky is different from ours. YellowAries2010 (talk) 16:26, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not the author or editor of that section, but the US having 9 times the population of Canada and a greatly more influential culture means that, yes, it should go first. And you don't have better bacon. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.178.117.223 (talk) 02:30, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bizarre that no mention is made of toast under United States (although it is pictured) - not everyone eats biscuits, bagels, and donuts. Indeed, toast is the default bread offering in most restaurants for breakfast. Also, no mention of danish, coffee cake, etc. There are also regional sausage products like scrapple and goetta that aren't mentioned.

Old saying about breakfast

[edit]

There is quite a lot of information in this article, at the beginning of the article, on how some nutritionists have considered breakfast to be the most important meal of the day. Given that this information is here, could this article include reference to the old saying about breakfast: "Breakfast like a king, lunch like a princess, supper like a pauper"? This information could go at the beginning of the article, where the information on the nutritionists is. ACEOREVIVED (talk) 15:15, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just in case any one is curious, I have just done a Google search, and the fountainhead of that proverb appears to be Adelle Davis. ACEOREVIVED (talk) 15:22, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

First image titled "Western breakfast foods"

[edit]

I suspect that this is not a typical breakfast plate but either an unusual breakfast plate (served in a fancy hotel?) or rather a collection of breakfast foods on 1 plate and hence somewhat unrepresentative. I'd rather see an image of a typical breakfast plate. And I suggest that this is not "Western" breakfast foods but more accurately "American" breakfast foods. I live in the UK, travel in Europe and have never seen a strawberry dipped in chocolate for breakfast. I guess I'm uncomfortable with people thinking this is what most westerners eat for breakfast. Sorry I don't have a better image to suggest. Asmoe (talk) 09:15, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

American here. I've never once seen a strawberry dipped in chocolate at breakfast either. I'm not sure what that's representative of, but it's not a typical US breakfast. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.178.117.223 (talk) 02:32, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Breakfast. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 21:49, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on Breakfast. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:26, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Compare today's article to its historical version

[edit]

Back in 2002 when this article was first created on Wikipedia (by an IP) this is what it looked like:

Ottawahitech (talk) 16:08, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Missing South American Breakfast section

[edit]

Hello, I just noticed there aren't any south american countries in the list (only Caribbean and north american). I'm not good at writing articles but some country cuisine articles have stuff regarding their breakfast dishes that can be added to the article. As for my experience, I can only write about Colombia's breakfast which I can that the traditional one consists of Milk and Coffee or Colombian Hot Cocoa served with eggs (either fried, boiled or scrambled) and bread or most of the times Arepa (notice that Arepa is also from Venezuela). Colombian Arepa in the morning is eaten either with butter on top or with Colombian "Campesino" style cheese . In some cases, Colombian Buñuelos, Pan de yuca / Almojabanas (Colombian cheese bread) or Colombian Chorizo can be added to the menu. Often popular among older people, another type of Colombian breakfast is the "recalentado" (meaning: re-heated) which consists of rice and pinto beans mixed together served sometimes with arepa and/or chorizo though there are many ways you can make this dish, even with things from last night's dinner (hence the name of the dish). American-style breakfast such as cereals or pancakes are also served (mostly in middle or high income families) but the traditional breakfast continues to be the most popular one among Colombians.

I can also tell from my small experience in Argentina that they have a very european-style breakfast with sweet pastries called Facturas which also exist in paraguay. Maybe someone can make a better research in argentina's breakfast. Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.34.54.118 (talk) 20:59, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Breakfast. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:37, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Desayuno" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Desayuno. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. PamD 11:55, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Split off worldwide breakfast

[edit]

The section "Worldwide breakfast" takes up over 90% of the article. I propose to split it into a new article Worldwide breakfast. Then the article History of breakfast could perhaps be moved back to this article, as it's only a third of the size of the "Worldwide breakfast" section. Also there is considerable content overlap in History of breakfast and the "Worldwide breakfast" section. This should be merged, handled by a case-by-case basis per continent or country. JIP | Talk 12:29, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I moved the article to Breakfast by country. Super Ψ Dro 20:55, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Breakfast

[edit]

Breakfast is the first meal of the day eaten after waking from night's sleep, in the morning. There is a strong likelihood for one or more "typical", or "traditional", breakfast menus to exist in most places, but their composition varies widely from place to place, and has varied over time, so that globally a very wide range of preparations and ingredients are now associated with breakfast. 2409:4072:281:DAA1:5441:A209:466A:1D79 (talk) 08:23, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Breakfast

[edit]

its pretty cool, except when my b word mom gives me that liberal veggie bacon bullcrap. not. a. fan. but i would kill for a nice flapjack, a pancake if you will, right about now. Breakfast was invented in 1993 with the birth of RJ Mitte, the first breakfast champion. because of his hard work and sacrifice, men, women, people, can all enjoy a nice refreshing meal at the beginning of each day, the most important meal of the day, breaking the fast that we all experience while resting our heads for beddy bye. Some classic Breakfast items include: eg bacon fruit juice pancake waffle cereal belgian waffle crepe flapjack fondue grape orange nana granola granola bar pizza ice cream quiche? 1 gallon of milk weetabix cheese block bean on toast french toast regular toast hot dog gurt danimals sleep nicotine and coffee liquid oxygen 2 carts and a glass of appy juice, maybe some top idk

Thats all i can think of right now, but please feel free to edit and add whatever you like — Preceding unsigned comment added by FlynnthebreakfastchampionWhite (talkcontribs) 20:04, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I agree Mr. FlynnthebreakfastchampionWhite, your b word mom is exceptionally cringe, especially with that veggie bacon. From what I hear your paternal figure is a great fella who has no connections whatsoever to various criminal syndicates in the area surrounding and in Alberquerque, New Mexico in the zip code 87104. 128.193.154.186 (talk) 19:45, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

First image of "Traditional English Breakfast"

[edit]

This image is not of a traditional English breakfast. 2A02:C7E:3A1E:8600:58D6:EB4D:9028:5363 (talk) 21:03, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. Made these changes. Zefr (talk) 00:49, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: English 202A Writing in the Social Sciences

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 23 August 2022 and 9 December 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Jessica nakkoul (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Gqc5313, Jqp5962.

— Assignment last updated by Benjamsredcob (talk) 22:45, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Question about a statement on breakfast

[edit]

At the bottom of this article is a statement, "Present professional opinion is largely in favor of eating breakfast, but skipping breakfast might be better than eating unhealthy foods." I'd be interested to get the opinion of a dietician or other expert to judge the appropriateness of this statement. ScienceFlyer (talk) 01:53, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 23 February 2024

[edit]

breakfast (brek’fast), n. [BREAK1 + FAST2] the first meal of the day, typically eaten between 6 am and 9 am SupperIsSuper (talk) 06:03, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. JTP (talkcontribs) 06:41, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

First Image

[edit]

The first image in the article has the liquid shown listed as juice. I do not think that it is juice, it looks to be maple syrup based on the size and shape of the container, the color, and its proximity to the waffles in the image. SleepyJabberwocky (talk) 23:05, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@SleepyJabberwocky Woah, Schrodinger's syrup. Simply based on the inclusion of juice in the description, I saw the syrup as both juice and syrup. Would not have noticed if you didn't point it out.
anyways, Sleepy is right, that's syrup Joshua Kazarian (talk) 05:15, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Commentary on this article

[edit]

The Breakfast Book (2013) by Andrew Dalby has some commentary on this page. Obviously not so current as it once was, but still informative:

Breakfast foods are thought to be typically eaten during morning hours, these foods are distinct from other foods even if eaten outside of the morning. In this sense, some serve breakfast for supper.

— Wikipedia, ‘Breakfast’ (2011)

There is obvious good sense to be found in those two sentences. We’ve seen the ways in which breakfast foods ‘are distinct from other foods’, and we won’t argue with people who think that breakfast foods are ‘eaten during morning hours’. Also apparent in this quotation is the chronic indecision that makes it such a challenge to extract truth from the encyclopaedia that anyone can edit. There is no need to make any concession to the insomniac and confused Wikipedians who get themselves breakfast ‘outside of the morning’. In the following geographical survey, as elsewhere in this book, breakfast is the first meal of the day, it is never the largest meal and, I firmly insist, it is taken before noon.

Rollinginhisgrave (talk | edits) 08:35, 30 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]